The Biden Administration today launched a civilian Climate Corps program intended to employ 20,000 Americans to build and restore public lands. The idea is to create jobs while also working toward the Biden Administration’s promise to reach net zero emissions by 2050, deploying corps members to work in wind and solar production as well as environmental conservation projects. Created in the image of a Great Depression-era civilian climate corps program incorporated by former President Franklin D. Roosevelt, Biden’s program aims to “mobilize the next generation of conservation and resilience workers and maximize the creation of accessible training opportunities and good jobs.” However, the program will employ far less than the more than 3 million men in Roosevelt’s era.
The program was initially outlined in an executive order Biden issued during his first month in office. Originally, $30 billion was set aside for the program as a part of the Inflation Reduction Act, but this was ultimately removed. Administrative officials declined to tell the Washington Post how much or from where funding will come from instead, the outlet reported.
On Monday, House Democrats called on Biden to move forward with the program, citing the urgency of the climate crisis as demonstrated by recent flooding, extreme heat and devastating wildfires like those that ravaged Maui in August. “By leveraging the historic climate funding secured during your Administration, using existing authorities and coordinating across AmeriCorps and other relevant federal agencies, your Administration can create a federal Civilian Climate Corps that unites its members in an effort to fight climate change, build community resilience, support environmental justice and develop career pathways to good-paying union jobs focused on climate resilience and a clean economy,” they wrote.
On Sunday, tens of thousands of protestors marched in New York City urging Biden to declare a climate emergency, which he still has not done in spite of experts warning of an ongoing “biological holocaust” while humanity dangerously pushes our planet to its extreme limits. Meanwhile, record-shattering heatwaves made summer 2023 the hottest in humanity’s history and the U.S. experienced a record-breaking 23 natural disasters exceeding $1 billion in damages.
growing plants is actually the worst way to go about that. the oceans hold the largest amount of carbon sequestration. oceanic algae is actually the top oxygen producer (which directly relates to carbon being removed.)
It’s important, though to get off fossil fuels ASAP. which makes me annoyed at this. Because… we know this. We’ve known this since I was in higshchool. And yet… he’s still approving oil projects like the willow project, and subsidizing oil.
Maybe, but the thing about plants is that they grow themselves. Which means they’ll still be contributing after funding gets cut and the project scrapped.
right up until they get slashed and burned to make room for the farmland.
There’s loads of flaws in it, but it’s a method that could push back on global warming on a wide scale fairly cheaply.
There’s much better ways. For example, stoping subsidies on oil. All of them. There’s an easy 6trillion right there.
You create change with economics. People are switching to EVs because long term they’re more affordable, people will say it’s because they’re green, but really, it’s the affordability.
Remove the subsidies and suddenly you create a level playing field and increased demand gives economies of scale for green alternatives like wind, solar and such like. Also grid scale energy storage, we have the technology but it’s “expensive” because there’s not enough to justify mass production. (Nickel hydrogen batteries, for example are extremely reliable, and extremely cheap- made from nickel and hydrogen placed in a pressure vessel. They’re used in space for their reliability and lack of charge/discharge cycle lifespan)