• WhatUpFlava@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well yea he far right and idiot farmers refuse to use modern or sane practices, leading to an 100% self inflicted crisis we all get to pay for.

  • logmathr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    In the Netherlands this is almost completely caused by farmers (that are overrepresented in the water boards) which keep the groundwater level low for better yields. This obviously backfires during the summer when the levels get too low.

    • klangcola@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Genuine question: Is that good or bad? What kind of farmers? Food or tulips? Humans gotta eat, and I thought Netherlands produces a lot of Europe’s agricultural output

      • Zoutpeper@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not even for better yield, it’s for better access with heavy machinery And the Netherlands exports too much as this water issue is one of a few ways in which our agriculture intensity is harming the long term health of nature and the fertility of the land itself

              • jaykstah@waveform.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                So the farmers reduce the water table so the country isn’t muddy?

                No, it’s so the are they’re farming on isn’t too muddy for the heavy machinery. They’re not talking about the areas peope are normally driving on.

                But the water table being lower than the rainfall means there’s a drought and things are getting too dry. That’s not good for anybody. It harms the very ecosystem they’re trying to farm in.

      • MercuryUprising@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Farmers as being described here are not some podunk hillbillies living off the land. These are massive corporate entities who have cannibalized their competition over the last 60 years. They don’t toil in the fields, their hordes of underpaid Southeast Asian and African immigrants do that for them, while they drive around in Land Rovers.

        This is not something done out of necessity, this is done out of keeping their profit margins as high as possible.

        • PopcornChickn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Im just going to step up and point out that I am not a podunk hillbilly living off the land. I am a well educated human being that left the city during the pandemic to keep all my food as local as possible (read: from my yard or my neighbors). I also sell at a farmstand on my own property, as well as donate to food pantries in my current area, the pantry for the neighborhood that raised me which is a food desert, and to my religiously affiliated (not a christian by any stretch, by the way) pantry.

          That said, I am not a European and maybe you have farmers/homesteaders out there that are like that-- but I kindly request you do not lump all of us into such a shit category.

          It’s not nice to make assumptions about a large group of people-- history has taught us that time and time again.

          On the massive corporate farms, however… no matter where-- you’re 100% correct.

          • Kaldo@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Unless you are “intentionally keeping the land dry for better yields and easier access with heavy machinery” or have “hordes of underpaid immigrants working for you” I don’t think you should feel called our or lumped together with them in this characterization 😋

  • PopcornChickn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Maaan, at this point I think we’d be lucky to get to 2030 without some globally catastrophic weather event.

    • MercuryUprising@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Global warming won’t even be the real issue for us. Once we have issues like fish stock collapse and crop shortages, people will be happy enough to position themselves as the new greatest threat to humanity.