They are always so quick to fixate on “women” in combat roles. But what about them specifically? Some men are smaller, weaker, less able, some men are overweight, low endurance, slow…
So what’s the actual physical criteria you are looking for? Are you willing to enforce that fairly and universally? If so, does sex even remain a core factor beyond those metrics?
It’s basically “DEI” for guys… You physical shortcomings are mostly ignored so long as you get through training, but for women there’s this additional scrutiny and you have to be an absolute badass to get taken seriously
That’s what I’ve always thought. If they can do the pushups, runs, etc, then who cares about their gender? It doesn’t matter if women are statistically less capable in those areas if every individual is going to be evaluated anyway. Their is no good reason to filter recruits based gender, 'cept sexism obviously
Conservatives are obsessed with gender and gender roles.
