Stamets [Mirror]@startrek.website to Risa@startrek.websiteEnglish · 1 year agoWhat a horrible day to have eyesstartrek.websiteimagemessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up1271arrow-down111
arrow-up1260arrow-down1imageWhat a horrible day to have eyesstartrek.websiteStamets [Mirror]@startrek.website to Risa@startrek.websiteEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square26fedilink
minus-squarefeedum_sneedson@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 year agoI always thought it was evolved, which I didn’t understand at all.
minus-squareOlgratin_Magmatoe@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12·1 year agoYou didn’t understand it because it just didn’t make sense. There is a very good reason why it’s one of the most poorly rated episodes across all of trek.
minus-squareQuark95@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·1 year agoIt was, and it doesn’t make any sense. That’s not how evolution works lol, the writers really should’ve gone with mutating instead
minus-squareVindictiveJudge@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·1 year agoIf there’s one thing Trek is totally consistent about, it’s the writers having no fucking clue what evolution is.
minus-squaresj_zero@lotide.fbxl.netlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down1·1 year agohttps://www.newsweek.com/crabs-evolved-five-times-carcinization-scientists-dont-know-why-1638921 Its Like crabs. “They keep evolving into this! Why?!?”
I always thought it was evolved, which I didn’t understand at all.
You didn’t understand it because it just didn’t make sense. There is a very good reason why it’s one of the most poorly rated episodes across all of trek.
It was, and it doesn’t make any sense. That’s not how evolution works lol, the writers really should’ve gone with mutating instead
If there’s one thing Trek is totally consistent about, it’s the writers having no fucking clue what evolution is.
https://www.newsweek.com/crabs-evolved-five-times-carcinization-scientists-dont-know-why-1638921
Its Like crabs. “They keep evolving into this! Why?!?”