IT outfit says it can't — and won't — pay the ransom demand
  • Dasnap@lemmy.worldEnglish
    62·
    1 year ago

    This is definitely a ‘bankruptcy’ level failure. Why would anyone ever use this service again?

      • joe@lemmy.worldEnglish
        112·
        1 year ago

        I’m not a cybersecurity expert. Did they make a foolish decision that would warrant a lack of trust, or were they just unlucky?

        • HEISENBERG@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
          321·
          1 year ago

          They were moving the servers to another location and connected them all seemingly without any kind of firewall between them. Some servers were infected with malware which then spread out and infected the other ones, including the backup-servers.

          • joe@lemmy.worldEnglish
            111·
            1 year ago

            Yeah I read that but I don’t have the knowledge to say “what a rookie mistake” or “in hindsight that was a bad idea”. I take it, it’s the former?

        • TexMexBazooka@lemm.eeEnglish
          191·
          1 year ago

          In order for a ransomware attack to do this level of damage there are several layers of problems

          1. They were not properly prepared to prevent the ransomware attack
          2. They lacked either the experience or expertise to mitigate it and contain it once the attack started
          3. They don’t have an existing backup of any of the data lost
      • Fyurion@lemmy.worldEnglish
        91·
        1 year ago

        Not only that, but also a wave of lawsuits will probably gurantee they go bankrupt.