The parade was intended to demonstrate the country's readiness for a war, featuring members of North Korea's militia units.
  • 新星 [he/they/CPC bot]@lemmygrad.mlEnglish
    32·
    1 year ago

    it wasn’t even one event.

    Well, that’s a refreshing take to see. But that doesn’t make the event mentioned here not problematic or not a further motivator of the war

    • TheChurn@kbin.social
      32·
      1 year ago

      Well, that’s a refreshing take to see. But that doesn’t make the event mentioned here not problematic or not a further motivator of the war

      Did you miss the part where the first such event didn’t take place until after the invasion by the North?

      • 新星 [he/they/CPC bot]@lemmygrad.mlEnglish
        33·
        1 year ago

        Nope. That’s like saying the Emancipation Proclamation couldn’t have motivated any sides in the Civil War because it happened halfway through.

        • TheChurn@kbin.social
          31·
          1 year ago

          The comment I replied to said this:

          This was the instigating event behind the civil war.

          Dictionary.com says this for the word “instigating”

          Causing, initiating, responsible for

          Please explain how an event that occured after the invasion was the cause or initiator of the war.

          If you cannot, then admit you didn’t read the thread and just came in here to muddy the waters.

          If you are too proud to admit that, just ghost.

          • 新星 [he/they/CPC bot]@lemmygrad.mlEnglish
            32·
            1 year ago

            I didn’t claim they were correct. If you look above, I made a weaker claim than they did.

            that doesn’t make the event mentioned here not problematic or not a further motivator of the war