• miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    DivestOS absolutely slaps. Well, all things considered

    Edit: It’s absolutely fantastic for what it is, and that is fact. Maintained by a single person, well documented, and doesn’t promise more than it can deliver.

      • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’ve been using it for almost two years now, and I like it a lot. (small disclaimer, I’m running it on a OnePlus 5T, which is one of their so-called golden devices that it runs best on)

        It’s pretty much the next best thing after Graphene, if you don’t want to buy a Pixel.

        The guy who maintains it does an excellent job of documenting issues, what works on what device, what the system itself can and can’t do, it’s very transparent.

        He doesn’t overpromise either, and explicitely states that getting a Pixel with Graphene is the better option overall. Greatly appreciate the honesty.

        I’ll use it for as long as he’ll support my device, and then we’ll see if I switch to Graphene.

        One important thing though: While you can install microG, DivestOS doesn’t officially support it, and while most things work, some don’t. SafetyNet, for instance.

        • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          DIVESTOS DEVELOPER BANNING ME ON MICAY’S ORDERS OTHERWISE HE WILL INITIATE A SOCIAL MEDIA HARASSMENT CAMPAIGN AGAINST DIVESTOS

          Yes, this happened, and this is my favourite part as far as everything GrapheneOS head/mods have done to date. As dramatic as it sounds, Micay in realtime, in DivestOS’ XMPP chatroom, was accusing me of the typical “harassment ringleader campaign” BS, and ordered DivestOS/Mull developer (these are his aliases) SubZer0Carnage/Tad/SkewedZeppelin that if I was not banned immediately, DivestOS and him would face social media targeted campaign and DivestOS will have to forcibly pull off any borrowed GrapheneOS code. DivestOS developer dusted his hands off me, since he does not like me apparently for liking some closed source software and he benefits off of the crybully. Also, unlike the crybully, I have never harassed or harmed anyone because I have a moral conscience to not be an abusive asshole on internet, so he will face no issues on my end.

          Screenshot 1: https://i.imgur.com/Al65uTZ.jpg

          Screenshot 2 continuation: https://i.imgur.com/mT8W9pa.jpg

          • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I’ve heard of the general toxicity years ago already, but I will take no part in this drama and use whatever system fits the bill

            • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              The most recent incident that exists is lead dev accusing the following entities of being complicit in a swatting attempt, for which no evidence has been provided in the last 5 months: r/privacy users and moderators, r/PrivacyGuides moderators, CalyxOS members, Techlore members, individual reddit users and Louis Rossmann. The dev even had the audacity to hide behind an “autism” placard to justify his abusive behaviour and accusations.

              This is not personal drama, but proven and documented large scale incidents, and you should oppose toxicity, fake accusations and witch hunting, being a trans leftist. These are societal problems for all of us, and should be fought the same way we fight for social movements. The tech sector is so bad because it is filled with toxic dudebros like this, and many GrapheneOS supporters justify this behaviour as “security/IT people are like this”.

              • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                Well, I do oppose this kind of behaviour, but I also want to use a system that fits my needs.

                So what should I do? Making more people aware of issues is often the best we can realistically hope for.

                • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  12
                  arrow-down
                  9
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Are you seeing the problem with targeted downvotes towards my comments? I got precisely 5-6 downvotes suddenly in the past hour (for every single post and comment I have made for the past week or so) suddenly for a reason - vote manipulation via sockpuppets - this is the kind of crap they precisely do. What does a leftist do? Stop supporting and using that product, and switch to something that works just as fine. Continuing using something made by such horrible entities while saying otherwise is a kind of faux virtue signalling US govt does via news media.

                  Calyx if you want one of these pre-configured custom ROMs for Pixels only, and Lineage or /e/ if you want more device support.

                  If you think the part about locked bootloaders is so important, just know that they lie to the extent of going around in tech YouTuber comment sections and claim they have $1M Cellebrite Israeli toolkits to verify grapheneOS is safe against bootloader attacks like Evil Maid. https://i.imgur.com/woNxPhx.jpg

                  Please read the paper by Ken Thompson, co-creator of Unix and C, on why we should be able to trust the developer and NOT the code. https://www.cs.cmu.edu/~rdriley/487/papers/Thompson_1984_ReflectionsonTrustingTrust.pdf

                  • miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Okay, first of all: Chill, and let me lay out an observation here.

                    You are very passionate about that topic, maybe a little too much. The way you talk about it is too heated, and gives people the idea that a civil discussion might not be possible.

                    The fact that you immediately start conspiring about where your downvotes come from doesn’t make it any better.

                    Now, the issues you describe are very much real, and a problem. There are merits and downfalls in each project, each one handles these differently, and it is for us to decide how to react to that.

                    So, you’re saying that as a reaction, I should neither use Graphene nor DivestOS, am I understanding this correctly?

                    What then? Compromise my privacy by using less optimal systems? Why would I do that?

                    Doing things out of principle vs doing them out of practical use is something this community is quite aware of, isn’t it. Sometimes the decision isn’t easy, sometimes it is.