unhappy_grapefruit 2@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-21 year agohmm rocklemmy.worldimagemessage-square135fedilinkarrow-up1848arrow-down176
arrow-up1772arrow-down1imagehmm rocklemmy.worldunhappy_grapefruit 2@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · edit-21 year agomessage-square135fedilink
minus-squareF_Haxhausen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down5·1 year agoYou can’t not have them. Because they have you. They are in control.
minus-squareLemmysMum@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down18·edit-21 year agoYou lack an adequate understanding of the concept of belligerence. You can’t not have them because they are you.
minus-squareF_Haxhausen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down3·edit-21 year agoIt isn’t a lack of understanding of belligerence. It’s that I just don’t care about belligerence much anymore. Edit: Changed the word “it” to “belligerence” for clarity.
minus-squareF_Haxhausen@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoYes, and? I said I don’t care about belligerence. What does that have to do with me being here?
You can’t not have them. Because they have you. They are in control.
You lack an adequate understanding of the concept of belligerence.
You can’t not have them because they are you.
It isn’t a lack of understanding of belligerence. It’s that I just don’t care about belligerence much anymore.
Edit: Changed the word “it” to “belligerence” for clarity.
deleted by creator
Yes, and? I said I don’t care about belligerence.
What does that have to do with me being here?
deleted by creator