• Gladaed@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would disagree on them calling them defective. This is unnecessarily confrontational.

    I would rather say the neglige their existence while using the simplest useful model. They should consider if a better model might be more appropriate.

    • OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would disagree on them calling them defective. This is unnecessarily confrontational.

      That is only one or the reasons it is wrong to call them defective. They arent defective.