• Rumo@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Well yes and no. There are communist systems that centralize power (mostly to establish a system without it) but there are a lot of different ways to do it other than that. Anarcho Communism for example is the complete opposit which does not want to go the authoritarian way even short term. Because well that did not quite work out. Authoritarian states still are authoritarian states. And i myself dont like/want those ^^

    • brain_in_a_box@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Because well that did not quite work out.

      Worked out better than any anarcho communist project ever did.

      • Rumo@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Not in my opinion. I dont think forcing yourself upon others and establishing totalitarian states is a success. If you mean working as becoming the main party then sure but i think working is establishing its principles. And there are anarchistic projects that worked quite well im that sense. They never lastet but they did often change a lot. For example the spanish civil war, the paris kommune. Those are the biggest ones. But anarchistic principles were always important. Many “primitive” cultures were egalitarian ones, which they did a lot to keep it that way.