• helenslunch@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Compaq “beat” IBM.

    I don’t know anything about Compaq. Was their business built on reverse engineering IBMs system and impersonating IBM hardware to gain unauthorized access to their servers and services?

    Apple can only change the iMessage protocol itself very slowly

    They changed it in <3 days.

    iMessage is a giant cash cow for them. They’ve stated as much. They will dedicate a massive amount of resources to ensure that is not lost.

    Beeper users will eventually become tired after the 3rd or 4th time they can’t send/receive messages to Apple users at all anymore because they can’t deregister their phone number from iMessage and Beeper Mini is broken.

    • entropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I don’t know anything about Compaq. Was their business built on reverse engineering IBMs system and impersonating IBM hardware to gain unauthorized access to their servers and services?

      It was actually even more hardcore than that. They reverse engineered IBM’s BIOS to create the first fully compatible non-IBM PC that could run MS-DOS and all IBM PC software natively. Then they won in court after proving they didn’t copy any of IBM’s source code and that the people who programmed the compatible BIOS had never even seen the original documentation for the IBM code, let alone the code itself.

          • helenslunch@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            They reverse engineered IBM’s BIOS to create the first fully compatible non-IBM PC that could run MS-DOS and all IBM PC software natively

            This doesn’t sound like anything that’s dependent on IBM servers or services. It also doesn’t sound like something that IBM could realistically fix easily and retroactively, which is the case here with Apple.