First, you said it was not oppressive, but stable, but nice try.
Second, they very much are. Oppression does not create a stable society, it merely bottles up tensions. But I wouldn’t expect a tankie fuck who gets hard over the deaths of minorities to understand that.
But you have fun jerking off to a million dead Iraqis.
Wanna remind me how many Iraqis Saddam’s regime killed?
God, imagine being so intellectually and morally bankrupt that you simp for Saddam’s Iraq. That’s some peak brainrot. I would say tankies never cease to amaze, but honestly, I’m not even a little surprised.
There was a bit of a minor scrap with some basically unknown fellows called the Mongols, and then there were the quarrels between the Mamluk Sultanate and the Turks, the constant rebellions and civil wars, then the Ottomans and the pseudo-feudal wars, separatist movements, and peasant revolts of that period, which include both prior-to and after the US’s founding.
not that it was particularly stable at any time prior
It was a hell of a lot more stable.
Oppressive was the word you were looking for.
No, stable.
Removed by mod
Everyday the definition of the word tankie becomes more nebulous; now it includes people who think the invasion of Iraq was a bad thing.
Removed by mod
Stable and oppressive are not mutually exclusive. But you have fun jerking off to a million dead Iraqis.
First, you said it was not oppressive, but stable, but nice try.
Second, they very much are. Oppression does not create a stable society, it merely bottles up tensions. But I wouldn’t expect a tankie fuck who gets hard over the deaths of minorities to understand that.
Wanna remind me how many Iraqis Saddam’s regime killed?
God, imagine being so intellectually and morally bankrupt that you simp for Saddam’s Iraq. That’s some peak brainrot. I would say tankies never cease to amaze, but honestly, I’m not even a little surprised.
Dictatorships usually are.
Ever? Or in recent times?
There were hundreds of years of peace before the US was even conceived.
uh
The crusades ended in the 13th century.
You… you do realize that the crusades weren’t the only military conflict in the Levant, right?
… right…?
You do realize that things were quiet for centuries after the crusades right?
… they most certainly were not.
Citation needed.
There was a bit of a minor scrap with some basically unknown fellows called the Mongols, and then there were the quarrels between the Mamluk Sultanate and the Turks, the constant rebellions and civil wars, then the Ottomans and the pseudo-feudal wars, separatist movements, and peasant revolts of that period, which include both prior-to and after the US’s founding.
Fuck off historical revisionist
Fuck off historical denier.
The Ottoman Empire was slowly conquering Iraq in the 1500, and uprises were happening from the 1600 on.