• ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          No, I don’t have any suggestion for how should Apple circumvent laws. But if they can’t improve on it, they shouldn’t lie that they did so.

            • hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              They’re lying about many things, such as their respect for privacy, right to repair, sustainability, what else. Oh they’ve lied about use of slave labor if I recall correctly

        • MagneticFusion@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          they can push a new TOS to the app store mandating that push nitifs be handled the same way signal handles them.

          • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Signal sends notifications via Apple’s push notification servers. So I’m still not quite clear what are suggesting. That apps run continuously in the background. each doing real-time polling of their respective servers for notifications? Because your battery ain’t going to last long.

            • MagneticFusion@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              the way signal and some privacy friendly apps do it is they send a blank notif first to wake up the app and then send the notif directly to you

              • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                That sounds like a cracking idea, the suggestion is that something in Apple’s ToS prevents this generally - but is that the case, if Signal manages it?