• Synthead@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Looks like they need to learn a thing or two about integration tests, redundancy, and fail-overs.

    A software update didn’t take it down. Negligence did. You should wonder why it doesn’t work before you ship to production.

    • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Yep.

      Where’s the non-prod test environment? For major systems we always have a multi-tier setup, of Test (pretty open, wild-west, but completely isolated and only test data on it), then Non-Prod Test, which looks a lot like production, has production-like test data, with User Acceptance Testing capability, still isolated from both prod and test. (We also have other layers of test too, say for hardware integration to backend, etc).

      Also, this example is why I constantly argue against auto updates for anything, even my phone apps.

      Without validation testing, you don’t know shit won’t work and then disrupt your work flow. My phone is a tool that I rely on to work a certain way.

    • cbarrick@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      Integration testing is great for release validation.

      But there’s also development work that should have been done on the release process itself, like support for progressive rollouts and easy rollbacks.

      • BearOfaTime@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Progressive rollout? Nah, these people are acting like it’s 1992 and just cowboy that shit up!