A transgender woman running for an Ohio House seat has been disqualified for failing to disclose her former name on petitions circulated to voters, in violation of a seldom-enforced state law.

Local election officials informed Vanessa Joy, who hoped to run as a Democrat for Ohio House District 50, that she was not eligible to do so, despite having collected the signatures necessary to run.

Joy sought to run in a firmly Republican district covering Stark County, just south of Akron.

  • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    23
    ·
    11 months ago

    People need to follow the law or change it. While its on the books, it needs to be engaged with in good-faith. A 30-minute free consultation with a lawyer could have cleared all this up

    • Silverseren@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      11 months ago

      She should push for it being applied to all the other politicians in the Ohio House. Any single one of them that had any form of name change for any reason or took the name of their spouse. They all need to be disqualified and kicked out, if we’re going to be enforcing this old ass law.

      • Kepabar@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        The law doesn’t apply to changes due to marriage.

        There probably aren’t too many others who have had a name change.

        • Silverseren@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          If the reason for this law is to not have someone change their name to hide some negative past from voters, a marriage name change is still just as concealing. Sally Smith to Sally Michaels when there are thousands of Sally’s out there is just as much hiding as anything else.

          • Kepabar@startrek.website
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            Honestly, it’s really not. It’s rather trivial to find marriage records to find the original name.

            Maybe it’s the same for legal name changes, I don’t know. I’ve never searched for it before.

            But anytime I’ve had to find out someone’s maiden name, it’s been trivial for me to do so.

            • Silverseren@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 months ago

              Maybe it’s the same for legal name changes, I don’t know.

              It is, I’ve done it. Any form of name change is just as easy to look up as marriage records, since changing your last name in the latter uses the same legal process as the former. Since it’s still just a name change.

      • cheese_greater@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        So we agree? I’m not so naïve to totally discount bad-faith on the part of “the system” but yeah, I disagree that anybody is exempt from revealing publicly who they were on the way to who they are today, both in life and candidacy.