Summary

Kamala Harris’s presidential campaign failed to connect with low-income workers due to a perceived lack of listening, according to AFL-CIO, the largest federation of labor unions in the US.

While union members largely supported Harris, many low-income voters backed Trump, swayed by his messaging on economic insecurity.

Despite Biden’s pro-labor policies, including infrastructure investments, the AFL-CIO now faces challenges under a likely Trump presidency.

AFL-CIO emphasized labor unions’ resilience and commitment to fighting rollbacks while advancing organizing efforts.

With public approval for unions at a near 60-year high, the labor movement plans both defensive and offensive strategies to protect workers.

  • TacticsConsort@yiffit.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 days ago

    I wonder how much this whole situation resonates with what happened in Argentina, when they elected Milei.

    Milei to them was an obvious lunatic who would probably be terrible but had a small chance to be different, versus their traditional party who would very obviously just continue the country’s predictable economic decline.

    Then again, I can’t really see any way Trump could be good for you if you’re poor. Not ever by the most charitable interpretations.

    • AmidFuror@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      I think the difference is we already had Trump as President. Thinking he might be good now is admitting you have no idea how he was the first time.