Summary

Sen. Bill Hagerty (R-TN) dismissed the necessity of FBI background checks for Donald Trump’s cabinet nominees, claiming the public prioritizes implementing Trump’s policies over vetting appointees.

On ABC’s This Week, Hagerty criticized Biden officials and supported Trump’s expedited transition process, despite reports that many nominees, including Pete Hegseth and Tulsi Gabbard, have bypassed FBI checks.

Moderator Jonathan Karl expressed concern over abandoning standard vetting practices, but Hagerty argued the FBI is “weaponized” and insisted checks would be completed quickly, though no evidence supports his claims of agency bias.

  • Em Adespoton@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Funny thing… the FBI is “weaponized” against people who have dodgy backgrounds. I can see how that could present issues for the modern Republican party.

    That said… I’ve had that check done. It took about 4 months. Obviously, I’m not as high a priority as the US executive team, but Trump is in a situation where he needs to get everyone vetted by mid-December. That’s better than what he did last time around, where he didn’t even begin most of the vetting for appointments until after inauguration.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      There is nothing normal about this, stop trying to normalize it.

      He didn’t vet people after the inauguration last time. He didn’t do it at all.

      • fluxion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        He vetted them for not being like Hitler’s generals at a record pace afterward though

    • benignintervention@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I had a top secret clearance in my old job. The whole process usually takes less than 9 months and anything outside a year usually means there’s something fishy with your background. It boggles my mind that members of Congress aren’t required to have security clearances and waiving background checks is completely insane. They’re clearly hiding a lot of nefarious and dodgy crap that would otherwise disqualify them from office

      • orclev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        The process must have slowed down considerably. About two decades ago I had a security clearance (just a basic one for access to some military bases for contract work) and that process, although the paperwork was a nightmare, got cleared in under 2 months. I’m sure a higher level of access takes longer, but equally someone being vetted for one of the highest offices in the world is certainly going to be a higher priority than some military contractor pleb.

        • benignintervention@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          23 hours ago

          About a decade ago there was a huge Chinese hack into one of the security clearance contractors, who then lost the contract, so the final remaining contractor has been playing catch up ever since.