• Diplomjodler@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    17 hours ago

    But the DNC would rather hand their country to the fascists than allow progressive ideas to gain traction.

    • Jesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      If you read that article, all of those policies are economic policies that Harris was pushing. Punishing price gouging, lowering rent and mortgages costs by incentivizing building and banning price fixing algorithms, etc.

      Those races either had more effective communicators, or shittier opponents. They were democratic candidates that ran on the Democratic Party’s policies.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Or course, being moderates, they didn’t mean a word of it.

    But it does show that even feigned progressive populism brings out the voters that running to the right alienates.

    • Jesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Yeah, but read the article, look at the policies those people campaigned on, and google whether or not Harris also backed those economic policies. She did. She supported and ran on most of those policies.

      IMHO, this was probably more of an issue around how effective the candidates, and their opponents, were at getting the policies or “vibes” in voter’s minds.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        She supported and ran on most of those policies.

        She ran on “don’t do anything different from Biden” and “Look! We got Cheney’s endorsement!” and “shut up, the economy’s fine!”

        • Eatspancakes84@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Of course they were taking it seriously. You can criticise the strategy, but clearly they took it very seriously.

        • Jesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Yeah, just saying that the policies mentioned in the article were not what made those people win or made Harris lose. They basically had the same policies.

          • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            15 hours ago

            I disagree, from the article those candidates had more anti-corporate policies that addressed the issue of cost of living. The closest thing Harris ran on was to crack down on Price gouging, which was/is one of her most popular positions, yet she also did not campaign enough on that front and contrasted it with housing deregulation