Mickey7@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 12 days agoSeems like solid advicelemmy.worldimagemessage-square67fedilinkarrow-up1655arrow-down175
arrow-up1580arrow-down1imageSeems like solid advicelemmy.worldMickey7@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 12 days agomessage-square67fedilink
minus-squareAcinonyx@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down24·11 days agoif males get disadvantaged, they’re getting closer to the same level as everyone else, thus increasing egality
minus-squaretjsauce@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·10 days agoBy disadvantaged, do you mean removal of privilege or wanton sexism? Because the latter is the point the others want to clear up. The words you use are good, but the context is bad.
minus-squareMothmanDelorian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 days agoSo your solution to ending sexism is more sexism?
minus-squareAcinonyx@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·8 days agothat’s realistically more achievable than the other way around
if males get disadvantaged, they’re getting closer to the same level as everyone else, thus increasing egality
By disadvantaged, do you mean removal of privilege or wanton sexism? Because the latter is the point the others want to clear up.
The words you use are good, but the context is bad.
So your solution to ending sexism is more sexism?
that’s realistically more achievable than the other way around