Summary
Donald Trump and Republican lawmakers are pushing to classify vandalism against Tesla as domestic terrorism.
Trump declared that those damaging Tesla dealerships would face terrorism charges, calling the company “a great American company.”
Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene and others urged the FBI and Attorney General to investigate alleged Democrat-linked NGOs behind Tesla attacks, though no evidence was provided.
Greene may have violated House ethics rules by advocating for Tesla while owning its stock.
What about Vandalism against other car dealers. That’s also domestic terrorism, right?
This is coming from someone who doesn’t necessarily disagree with burning down Tesla dealerships.
Define terrorism
Explain how burning down Tesla dealerships to resist Elon’s political takeover is not terrorism
If you want to define it as a political takeover then it’s legitimate action to protect the state from an unelected and ineligible person conducting a coup. After all words have meaning right?
Well that’s my point, we should be arguing the legitimacy of the action, not whether or not it constitutes terrorism, which it obviously is.
Not american so have limited knowledge, but that’s what the “well armed militia” is supposed to be fore right? To allow the public to protect itself from a corrupt or otherwise dangerous political parties?