it is not. we exchanged 7 emails and they basically laughed at my face.
it is not. we exchanged 7 emails and they basically laughed at my face.
you are obviously ignorant about the meaning of the word ignorant, you should check it out 😆
Putin is a fascist dictator and you expect him to act that way. Democratically elected politician in democratic country should behave differently and when he doesn’t, it obviously result in some outrage.
i think registration and actually sending any money will be two separate steps, but it is still lot of dumb people.
meanwhile at the fuck off department, as a reply to “delete everything”
is it two different establishments, or have they built their own nuclear vaults with blackjack and hookers?
i had to google love has won, but this is funny:
Leader: Amy Carlson (“Mother God”)
i imagine mother god must have pissed lot of people, so yay for feminism 😂
S&P500 gained 3+% the day after election
and considering that index gained 90% over the course of last 5 years and 700% over the last 30, that is a strong indication of… something. probably random variance 😆.
which (if you don’t believe the daily stock market is just gambling) presumably means
yeah, that is strong assumption 😂
macro economy does not work like that. any complex system has inertia like an ocean-liner. you turn a wheel and it turns after 10 miles.
seeing something is nice, but analysis of what you see is not necessarily withing the reach of “common sense”, which is why we have scientist who study the problem for all their life and professionals in their field.
and that is why people trying to manipulate masses are trying to convince dense people not to trust the science and trust their common sense. because such gullible people can then be convinced about anything they decide to.
also @Fubarberry@sopuli.xyz’s story reads like a really bad republican fan-fiction. “explosive growth” under trump and doom and despair under democratic president. come on, no administration has that big effect on your daily life. there are countries where it takes time to establish government after the elections and guess what, the day to day life still goes on even with no government present.
What a CONVENIENT verse for the slave owners.
reminds me of the joke that in another two thousand years, future archeologists will have no idea what is the difference between butt dial and booty call.
and yet here we are with piece of shitty fiction written two thousand years ago, being passed in oral tradition and rewritten and retranslated multiple times, and some morons are trying to use it and force it upon others as a guideline how to live a life in 21st century…
the coming popular revolt
doubts. i do have some.
He will be replacing generals with fox news stuff until they do.
Decisive is winning popular vote, winning all swing states and having control of white house, congress and supreme court.
she would be very surprised if she could read. i wonder who would pay for a lot of walls that would need to be built, though.
https://gppreview.com/2020/02/21/growing-divide-red-states-vs-blue-states/
also, don’t forget that, these are people willing to work with him. i imagine that is not big club.
there is nothing misleading about the headline. street navigation is quite primitive use case compared to what some others were suggesting (like firing stuff of suicide hotline and replacing them with chatbots).
while machine learning can no doubt be useful tool for many of narrowly specified specific tasks, where all you need to do is evaluate lot of data and find pattern in it, the business behind it acts as if it already had invented GAI and unfortunately will keep pretending that and probably cause lot of damage in hunt for money.
First lady is not going to be happy about it
They’re just out here with scholarly citations for every single thing they’ve ever said and didn’t reply because they couldn’t immediately cite a paper with a counter argument.
there is big difference between not having scientific citation and not being able to say why you say things.
“i am just saying words man, why do they have to mean anything…?”
The reductio ad absurdum fallacy occurs when someone tries to prove an argument false by misapplying the premises or making false and absurd conclusions from the argument. It is similar to other fallacies, such as the appeal to ridicule, the straw-man, and the slippery-slope fallacy.
he was not