“I don’t know how to read”

So drag somehow thinks that believing in nothing is easier than believing in proven fact?

Drag is saying that depressed people should “just believe” which is much crazier than saying depressed people should “just believe in evidence”.

People do not need to believe in what drag is saying without evidence, because that evidence exists, so they can just as easily believe in it WITH evidence.

No? I’m depressed, too.

Let me do the same stupid shit drag just did.

Is that your advice to depressed people who think life is hopeless? Belief in things without having real evidence?

My point is that drag came to the wrong conclusion.

Drag doesn’t have to explain depression to me.

If Drag understood the evidence, then it sounds like the conclusion Drag should come to is not to baselessly believe in things without evidence, but rather to make a better use of context to rid dragself of blindness caused by anecdotal evidence.

Well, the problem with this line of thinking is that we do have empirical evidence that depressed people DO get better by making a huge effort to get better.

Drag had anecdotal evidence, which is incredibly weak evidence.

Drag may have had baseless belief in something and it worked out, but my point is, the evidence WAS available to support that point.

Pretty uncharitable interpretation of something posted by someone who I would guess you have a common goal with.

People that give a fuck about “priceless art” or whatever are so silly. Lmao.

I’m not saying to not continue posting articles like this, but I do think that maybe your time would be better spent arguing with people who don’t believe in climate change instead of arguing with people who do believe in climate change.