• 4 Posts
  • 104 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 13th, 2023

help-circle








  • I don’t know SP or how its shortcuts work, but did you check if you already have those shortcuts assigned in plasma’s global shortcuts? The easiest way is to assign them to any plasma global shortcut and see if it tells you there’s a conflict.

    If that’s not it, can you trigger those SP actions with an external command? Then you could do it through plasma global shortcuts.









  • I made my account with them early on. I signed up to subscription content to eventually get around to reading, using that address. I signed up for other services, using that address, where access to that address was my only recovery option. I joined IRL community interest groups with that address.

    Then I spent a long time without checking it, and they deactivated the account and I’ve lost all data and messages sent there.

    And lost my discord account, too. Even though I have the correct discord credentials, discord decided to lock me out unless I can confirm I still have that tuta email address.


  • The Wikipedia link you provide here for copyleft does not say that permissive licenses are a subset of copyleft licenses, but rather contrasts the two categories. For example, you can scroll down to the table at “Types and relation to other licenses,” where you can see MIT is not in the green Copyleft column.

    If you check Wikipedia’s Copyleft software licenses category, you’ll see MIT is absent.

    The Wikipedia link you provide for permissive states:

    The Open Source Initiative defines a permissive software license as a "non-copyleft license . . .


  • No, I don’t. I don’t know the strict definition of copyleft, so I went to the source you indicated to get a better understanding. And the phrase I found there:

    Unlike copyleft software licenses, the MIT License . . .

    certainly indicates that the MIT License is not copyleft.



  • I checked the wiki page you kind of linked, and the third sentence is:

    Unlike copyleft software licenses, the MIT License also permits reuse within proprietary software, provided that all copies of the software or its substantial portions include a copy of the terms of the MIT License and also a copyright notice.