This is not the correct interpretation. There’s only insurrection that can get your banned - and that’s exactly what he did.
This is not the correct interpretation. There’s only insurrection that can get your banned - and that’s exactly what he did.
A Trump defender defying the constitution? Why, I never!
Yes it is… The Constitution says so. I’m sorry you don’t like it, but those are the binding rules.
We hear this every 3 months but it hasn’t happened yet…
We’re failing them.
Meanwhile Trump’s threatening to kill us for existing, and he’s who they were fighting for.
Justice.
No one should make such a risky assumption even about what they think, much less the actual outcome.
No one should have enough wealth to have more influence over society than your single vote allows.
That’s an implausible metric. As long as there is not communistic equality, there will always be discrepancies in influence.
No one should have that much power.
How do you reconcile that with government leaders having that much power?
It’s like if the Aztec and the Cybertruck had an ugly baby.
It’s Florida all the way down.
Still safer than fossil fuels.
I don’t understand why filling the drive isn’t enough to overcome wear leveling.
I’d never heard that, but ChatGPT agrees.
The joke is how vile things have become so normalized that we’re able to compartmentalize them so we can try to enjoy something more normal.
Humans use less energy because we’re bipedal. Even if the hunted animals walked, presumably humans could trail them and wait them out.
So, just use the stock electron, optimally the system one
What? The system what?
There’s no way to know if it’s all men or only gay men this is true for, besides it being only anecdotal.
Masterfully done.