I always think of the stockholders because often I am him.
My frugal lifetime is to pirate the content and used the saved subscription price to purchase additional stock each month.
Play both sides and always come out on top, or something.
It’s all unintentional. Their based will accept anything their king and his court declare as the truth.
From their perspective it is all intentional, don’t let their blind loyalty sway you to their view.
All of that can be equally true for cloud infrastructure. There is argument that the cloud company is more incentivizing to use 2 year olds to save labor costs.
In the cloud admin world, no one knows you’re a toddler.
Truely the stupidest person alive.
On-prem allows you 100% control on the downtime. You build internal trust by deciding when to upgrade, availability of hot swap, rollback, etc.
Cloud is just trust and it’s out of your control if they break that trust.
You, for example.
Ok, I took you as saying that neurodivergent was a good signal but yeah it’s 15-20% of the population.
It’s less specific than other factors such as being an adolescent male which is a stronger signal but also not a requirement.
It actually looks like lonliness with some disconnect from society is the strongest signal. And that’s why actual research should been done rather than some random speculative report full of personal biases.
What does neurodivergent mean to you because there is range of divergent behaviors.
This is based on speculation.
Based on the observations in article itself, many people have watched horrific videos and have not gone on to commit any crimes.
Instructions unclear.
Threw a brick through each window at the local strip mall.
I got some prime real estate on mars.
Anything that is lake front and wooded?
With all the rounds of layoffs they’ve had, their remaining employees would need to be quite stupid to give a shit what this disloyal piece trash says.
With free cancer!
That you use being offended to be offensive it is a common emotional response. So I accept the explanation that you are of simple mind in this regard.
You’ve have choosen to take the intolerance of one small opinion of mine and expanded it to total intolerance of me as a fellow human.
You do you.
Agreed. This is the one government agency where the majority of them benefit from its existence.
All but the very youngest boomers are already eligible.
They fucked around for decades, fuck us for decades and it’s time they find out.
They won’t be voting if they starve and die before the next election.
We already allow simulated rape in tv and movies. AI simply allows a more graphical portrayal.
Correct. This quickly approaches thought crime.
What about an AI gen of a violent rape and murder. Shouldn’t that also be illegal.
But we have movies that have protected that sort of thing for years; graphically. Do those the become illegal after the fact?
And we also have movies of children being victimized so do these likewise become illegal?
We already have studies that show watching violence does not make one violent and while some refuse to accept that, it is well established science.
There is no reason to believe the same isn’t true for watching sexual assault. There are been many many movies that contain such scenes.
But ultimately the issue will become that there is no way to prevent it. The hardware to generate this stuff is already in our pockets. It may not be efficient but it’s possible and efficiency will increase.
The prompts to generate this stuff are easily shared and there is no way to stop that without monitoring all communication and even then I’m sure work around would occur.
Prohibition requires society sacrifice freedoms and we have to decide what weee willing to sacrifice here because as we’ve seen with or prohibitions, once we unleash the law on one, it can be impossible to undo.
Fucking nuts. Bitch that the democrats aren’t doing anything, then blame them for how Trump behaves because of what they do. Insane shit.