Right, he should remove the last few humans and replace them with bots.

That’s true, but you know… one piece at a time

Amazon is going to replicate starlink with another 3000 satellites? How can we stop these people from polluting space even more?

Will a thin layer of alluminum stop this?

This is cool and sounds believable. Do you have other insights?

This theory is a self-fulfilling prophecy, it doesn’t need to be that way, unless you convince enough people that it has to be that way.

But it’s really not a fun fact

Exactly! That’s the most appropriate description!

English language doesn’t have an alphabet - change my mind (especially british, but american only made one step in the right direction and then stopped)

I’m sorry. I should have said muggles.

Where did all the energy in the universe come from? This is not physics, it’s methaphysics. We are talking about things that are outside our knowledge and science is descriptive, not prescriptive. Extrapolations must be tested. This is not much different from saying that the most remote galaxies receding at speeds faster than light is impossible, because nothing can travel faster than light. Maybe it’s just matter that can’t break that rule, while space itself can expand at whatever speed, or maybe it’s just an error somewhere in our assumptions. We still don’t know. But we DO think they are receding faster than light.

I think I know what you mean but if it’s what I think you are doing a terrible job at explaining it. Theories in the scientific jargon are not the same as theories in the common parlance. What the commoner calls a “theory” is what we call a conjecture or an hypothesis. A theory in science is a summarization of experimental results, so if this is your take, I get your point.

Found one

Ah yes they forgot the super fast bird that hunts for cyborgs in a dystopian future, blade runner

I thought it was the punk band No Effects

ok, this comment hurts more than the chart lol

Ok just to clarify this was a joke. It was just a pedantic improvement on a deranged solution. The only sensible way to do this is with % 2 or with bitwise operations imo.

No, i get what you both mean, i guess what i mean is that we shouldn’t internalize the defeat, we should keep being angry at companies for doing this shit

Are you me? I confirm 100%, on both sides

Wtf is this fear mongering? I’m totally for luddism but this is something else. Not the first time a machine kills a person, and will not be the last. Put panic stop buttons on any machine that can potentially harm a human, and nowadays you can add a range of sensors that can help identify a living thing from a box of vegetables. This is entirely the fault of designers.

Btw i refuse to read the article if the post keeps this title and picture.