… Yes…?

That would, in fact, be the purpose of a honeypot blackmail intelligence operation.

Mossad would not care to blackmail some random person. But having photos/video of a world leader assaulting a child? That would be very valuable to Mossad.

I’m not saying Mossad members are on that list.

I’m saying there is a lot of evidence that Mossad set the entire thing up to generate that list.

This should not be downvoted.

All available evidence is pointing to Epstein being an intelligence operation run by Mossad.

This you?

https://lemmy.world/comment/14175411

Yeah, that’s you.

When you’re so fascist that Jordanlund recognizes you as fascist, most people are going to give you a hard time.

I really do love user tags.

Canada is three mining companies in a trench coat.

It’s both not as liberal and not as nice as it has a reputation for being.

If Cascadia has a chance, it isn’t with Canada.

Irans retaliatory strikes defending against Israel’s unjustified cowardly sneak attack to start a fight the Israelis were to weak to win.

There, I fixed the title for you.

He absolutely redefined to justify killing children. Bush didn’t do that. It was used, under Bush, to justify torture and jailing of adults.

Obama re-invented it for his purposes. The purpose being to kill children without consequence.

In my mind, that definitional change is significant enough that he owns a lot of that blame.

Fucking goddammit, he redefined the word to justify killing children. Why do you defend that?

EDIT: Removed indirect articles for easier readability, content is the same.

It was under Bush to justify imprisoning civilians. Bush was all for direct war actions.

Obama massively increased bombings and drone bombings to pull out combat troops and would do stuff like double tap weddings. To lower the number of civilian deaths, Obama declared any male over the age of 14 to be, by definition, an enemy combatant.

The person you responded to was correct, though a bit imprecise with their words.

Before Epstein.

XMPP

Okay CIA.

You want failure and don’t want communism or socialism in other words.

You know what the single most powerful force in human history is?

Organization. Which is always hierarchal. It doesn’t have to mean socially, but definitely organizationally.

If anarchism didn’t exist, the CIA would have had to create it.

You know what the most common attribute of Anarchist revolutions is? They all failed. Every single one of them. That is what you want. Failure.

Maybe we shouldn’t give attention or awards to genocidal fucks actively engaged in genocide and should disrupt their attempts to garner positive attention.

You know, using the exact same justification you used to not give attention to someone disrupting a sports game, a much less important thing then FUCKING GENOCIDE.

As is your defense of Rhodesia.

It’s Lemmy.

The user base is tiny. And clients have tags.

For example, I didn’t follow you here. But, because I have your account tagged as ‘Rhodesia Lover’ I know whenever I see your account elsewhere, like here, you’re the racist that believes that unless there is a complete destruction of everyone involved that there is continuity of government.

So, by your definition, basically the only governments that don’t have continuity are…

…

I guess Paraguay before and after the War of the Triple Alliance?

This isn’t a legacy of slavery.

This is straight up slavery. They enslaved her.

The Japanese government won’t acknowledge many of its war crimes or paid reparations to its still living victims.

If Germany said the Holocaust never happened, that would reflect very poorly on the German citizens that continue to elect the Holocaust denying government officials and you would be justified in asking German tourists if they acknowledged the Holocaust.

I don’t know why you are being down voted.

I love that the Japanese are treating Israeli’s as members of the apartheid genocidal state that they are.

Japan also hasn’t recognized or paid reparations for many of the horrendous war crimes they’ve committed themselves.

Both things can be true at the same time.

2 years and 8 months for men?

My love for round numbers is offended.

If my culture had a term ‘n-wordass’ I would not have the unmitigated gall to try and argue it wasn’t racist.

Seriously, what is wrong with you?

Oh, that’s right, you’re trying to defend the use of an obviously racist term. You’re a racist. That’s what is wrong with you.