“Parking Meter at the Edge of the World”
That was a Douglas Adams book.
“Parking Meter at the Edge of the World”
That was a Douglas Adams book.
I tried turning them all off and nothing changed. Same result with the Duck Duck Go browser set on Android. Unique fingerprint. And I have no extensions. I wonder if my VPN is part of the fingerprint. I did read a lot of the explanation of what fingerprints you, but I didn’t see VPN in there. I should do a search on that page to see.
I tried that and then one of those “how common is your fingerprint” websites said my fingerprint was unique. Literally fucking unique.
I think it was the EFF site.
Might have something to do with other extensions I have installed like Canvas Blocker, uMatrix, etc.
Fuck, even in Mull on my phone where I only have a few extentions installed: uBlock Origin, cookie auto delete, local CDN, and a cookie consent blocker.
Don’t use shady sites. Use yt-dlp.
All analogies are clumsy. It’s an analogy, not a paper.
I feel like you’ve completely missed the point. I feel like OP is implying that just because there are infinite universes, it doesn’t mean you’re the leader of the world in any of them. Not all things are possible, even with an infinite number of universes.
OP didn’t say there are not an infinite number of you. They said 3 isn’t between 1 and 2, therefore infinite sets don’t necessarily contain every value.
That’s not at all what they’re saying. They’re saying that 3 is not between 1 and 2. They could have also have said there’s a continuum of real numbers between 1 and 2 but none of them are 3.
Is her wall made out of glass?
Well that sounds shitty.
I just quoted this comment and didn’t give attribution.
I just used this comment commercially.
For real, though. If the top-end of someone’s income is in the 28% tax bracket, and they donate $1000 to a qualified charity, then they get back the 28% tax they paid on that $1000, which is $280. They still donated $720 of their own money.
I say “their own money” because you could argue that the $280 is “America’s” money, but it’s not. The person donating the $1000 effectively never earned that money. Giving to charity is like redirecting your pre-tax income to the charity, so you don’t get taxed on it since it’s now the charity’s money, and the charity doesn’t pay income tax. The $280 was money that the government had withheld because they didn’t yet know you were redirecting that income to charity.
Also, it’s not cool to try to insult someone just because they criticized your comment. You need to keep an open mind. Especially since you were, in fact, wrong. You should only insult someone for being an asshole, or greedy, or racist, or a Trump supporter, etc., and not make yourself look like an idiot by assuming someone who points out your obvious error is a Trump supporter.
So you not understand what “I’m planning my exit ASAP” means?
Kangaroo.
What, you don’t use a kangaroo as a chair?
Prove to me you have a mind and I’ll accept what you’re saying.
Stop spreading unsubstantiated bullshit. Cite a source or GTFO. There’s no way this would be legal since you have to agree to an EULA for them to spy on you. It’s the first thing you see when you start enabling WiFi on a smart TV.
Just because some idiot on the internet said its possible doesn’t count as evidence that companies are doing it. They’re smarter than that and they know they’ll get sued if they do it. They wouldn’t take that risk when 99% of smart TV owners agree to the EULA and enable the smart features themselves.
Thing is, even though that’s the one thing that would work*, they don’t believe that.
* Except you’d start seeing relativistic effects in short order.