Is there a source for this graph? Would like to read the rest of it

Literally Hitler

(No need to thank me)

Are you concern-trolling? Because it feels like it.

Third-Positionists claim to be centrist, arguing “bOtH sIdEs hAvE a fAiR pOIIInT”. You cant just genocide “a tiny bit” or being “a little bit racist”, but in giving credit to the rights ideas, you enable them. Its even on wikipedia and is accuratly mentioning the “Fascism on the left” thing.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_Position

She is supporting Putin, a fascist dictator and is spreading missinformation on the matter. Google search: “Sarah Wagenknecht on Putin”. I tried it just know and boy there is a lot.

The other point: This article mentions she calls herself a “left-conservative”, which is an oxymoron, and also just regular moron. Or in her case, dishonesty. Because that would be social, but also national, fusing into national-social(ism). Also anti-climate regulation, calling it “blind planless Eco-Activism, costing people money, but actually doing nothing for the climate”. Literal denial of the efforts we make to safe the world. Another very Fascist talking point. Fascist cant defeat the Climate Crisis, because you cant it by being racist and unfuckable, some of the only things they actually do well.

https://www.zeit.de/politik/deutschland/2023-10/sahra-wagenknecht-partei-buendnis-faq#welche-positionen-koennte-bsw-fuer-vernunft-und-gerechtigkeit-vertreten

(Source is in German, sorry for that)

Also: Economic Policies ARE Social Policies. If you are right on them, you are just on the right. The idea that both are separated is naive at best and active malice at worst.

Sarah Wagenknecht is basically a Tankie and quite popular with the right.

Her leaving the left party (“Die Linke”), potentially siphoning votes from the right and causing fragmentation there is a good thing.

Also remember: Wanting to appeal to the left AND the right is just a third-positionist, which just ends up being another flavor of Fascism.

I would not trust her, but I recommend reading further into the matter to get an accurate picture.

Bro you don’t need to decouple

Trust me Bro it’s fine

Bro

Bro

You are listening to me Bro, right?

Me: “Interesting thought.”

Me after reading the comments: “This shit is more complex then family relationships in Austrian Royalty.”

This might be unpopular, but here goes nothing:

With the correct and fitting (and fair) regulations, oversight by the government and accountabilit, this is a correct and more ethical decision.

Stuff costs money. For now. Infrastructure, wages, repairs, fixes, improvements, new features.

All these things dont come free and we only pay nothing DIRECTLY, because we pay in data, attention and privacy violations.

By fixing this issue, the access to all these things can be secured without the plattform falling appart or having to resort to invasive data harvesting. We could even make these practices illegal, because plattforms would not just die then.

And no, the price should not be so high to generate profit for the executives. Thats why regulation is so important.

In the Modern Age we live in, Social Media is at this point akin to an essential service and should therefore be regulated as such: No profit, but stable maintenance and secure access free from monetary interest for everyone equally.

Anti-Masker: Check

Anti-Queer: Check

Loud Minority: Check

Thinking rules are for others: Check

Putting their ideology over their childrens health: Check

Making me feel a bit of sympathy for a school security officer is an archivement only the Republican voter base is capable of

Is it just me or does his face look to small for his head?

Before anyone comes in with “Religion of Peace” statements: Conservative Christians would do the same if they were in charge. Or in fact any hardliner + religion combo.

The Authoritarin Aspect is more the problem, then religion. But yes Religion is very susceptible to this.

I read a few comments on why the warmongering GOP now wants to stop sending weapons. Let me use this opportunity to make something clear:

What we see on display are the real world consequences of what happens when you have Fascists in politics! Here is list of some things Fascism is characterized by:

Logical Inconsistencies: Supporting expansion, use and increasing spending of military complexes and police, but then opposing war, even stopping Pentagon funding. Pro-War people would instead pass a bill firmly cementing funding instead and buy stocks of appropriate companies.

Self-Destruction: Shutting their own Government down, loosing support from agencies and taking a massive optical loss, because they are driven by dogma, ideology and emotion. Or cognitive disfunction and dillusion in cases like MTG.

Diplomatic Incapability: Not only an inability to reach across the isle, but not even getting along with nominally allied people WITHIN THE SAME PARTY!

The GOP used Fascism as soil for growing a base and now they reap the reward.

Purely economically speaking that is true, but that’s not the only relevant thing here.

Remember it’s the Chinese Government essentially harvesting massive ammounts of data. A price well worth it, if you use it later down the line in propaganda efforts, marketing strategies and “spotting potential dissidents”.

A more apt punishment would be forcing then to delete the data, prevent future harvesting or massively increase the fine to offset potential political gains.

Can someone explain the political intricacies of such an oath? What would it have meant if it was passed?

There are a lot of reasons, but I think it boils down to the people in charge do not want the embarrassement of crawling back to the EU.

It would be total ego destruction and that is simply untennable. This is what happens when the right gets enough power to make a change and then has to experience consequences.

Something something leopards and faces.

I’m expecting them to actually, if it hasn’t happened already. Because they know both will siphon blue votes away from their only RELEVANT opposition.

Sleepy Joe? More like “Waking Nightmare” for the GOP. It’s time to switch to blue if you planned on voting red.

Raise your hand if you are convinced this will not impact the people who pay for the blue checkmark. Meaning that a lot of Elon Fanbois / Bots / Fascists will be seen with theit shitty takes (since the checkmark pushes your comments up), while voices of reason will be dragged down further.

Twitter is rapidly becomming the new Truth Social and it’s sad to watch.

Cornell West SHOULD know better then doing stunts like this. Because even if the criticism is correct, he is siphoning blue-voters away to a politically useless or damaging position, like the Green-Party.

Which means he weakens the Democrats.

Which in turn means he strengthens the Fascist-GOP.

We can aknowledge the Truth, but always vote and always vote blue. NEVER risk a blue vote for the need to pride yourself on “fighting the corrupt system”.

Emotional validation is never an argument for weakening the only thing holding back Fascism in the US. To much is at stake!

I recently heard the argument that no men would mentally survive loosing to a women in chess, especially grandmasters.

ngl I wonder if this contains more then a kernel of truth