Their bodies formed the structure which housed him.

There’s not a strong enough argument there. If the things that were said around Jan 6 weren’t enough to break through this protection, vague threats probably won’t do it either.

Law only goes as far as political will.

“1880 was also a general election year in the UK, another country known for its contributions to the English language.”

Hilarious

Speech and debate clause

If you need one, staple by hand. If you need 30, make 29 copies with staple, and while they’re printing, staple the one by hand.

Or at least that’s what I would have said in my IT days lol.

Ok, would you hire a noticeably smelly lawyer?

I don’t need to take notes for work, but this seems great for documenting the home automation & media setup for my wife.

Same with my policy in the US. Already have it seasoned past the mark, so I joke with my wife that I can make her a millionaire.

Only need 65 more electoral votes to pledge.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Popular_Vote_Interstate_Compact

Trucking companies have switched the terms in the same way, since “accident” lightens responsibility. Even a not-at-fault crash could have been preventable often times, which is what they try to emphasize.

I have 3x 14 TB in a raidz1 setup on TrueNAS. Would take awhile to redownload but isn’t critical in any way, so I feel like that’s a good compromise.

People are always going to adjust their risk upwards as technology gets safer. Even if all cars were self-driving and perfect, some pedestrian will push the bounds of physics, stepping out with no time to stop.

These drivers aren’t going to sleep or Tiktoking in the first 30 minutes. They are being lulled into complacency by a tech that generally does a good job, and they have been told by marketing that we are so close to FSD.

It’s just that what you’re saying is meaningless. There is no way to test things fully until you deploy them. If they did their best in private lots then said it is out of testing, then got in accidents, you would be saying they never tested functionality in the real world.

I mostly disagree with their pitch to the public and marketing. It should have been pitched as advanced cruise, the way many cars have. I think it has misled buyers into being entirely too trusting of the Autopilot for its current abilities.

You should go to another part of the comments, then, because over here we were discussing the application of the statistic.

That is silly to say. Cars themselves are a convenience technology.

I am not defending him, just saying it’s wrong to use misleading stats even with a good point.

Close, but usage matters too. Just owning a car with driver assist doesn’t mean you use it at the same rate. Share of miles driven with assist features would be better.

Then if you want to get gritty, I guess we could try to quantify how complex the miles were. Dense city miles and construction zones should count more.

Love it haha. I don’t care about Tesla at all, but including the share of miles driven on Autopilot versus other companies’ tech would be much more revealing. If 90% of miles driven were on Autopilot, they would be outperforming their competitors.

This is one of those times you should realize how misleading statistics can be. Can you think of what might be a more informative measurement if we are actually after the truth?

I would love to share this with friends if it didn’t misspell “y’all”.