Nah, that’s taking it a bit far. The Madagascar Plan is enough, surely.

It would certainly solve all of Israel’s problems, though

Migrating a whole group of people, whatever could possibly go wrong?

Then you clearly haven’t tried hard enough

Says who?

Sincere question: would a baggy coat or rain mac be acceptable on the outside, since it still disguises the figure?

Also, if you’re out and about and wearing a coat underneath but then decide that you’re too hot, what’s the best way to remove it whilst keeping your modesty?

What’s 20? 100? 1000?

Yes, because no other country experiences famine

Sometimes it’s not a big difference. Using several different quotes in one article, all of which use the word ‘terrorist’ or other emotionally loaded words, is a clear indication that they think he’s a terrorist whilst technically remaining ‘neutral’ because they’re only quoting rather than forming a position

Well sure, I agree. But the BBC isn’t taking the moral high ground here. They have previously and will again use the word ‘terrorist’ to evoke an emotional response for international attacks.

It’s a decision that senior lawyers are criticising - https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2023/10/11/bbc-not-calling-hamas-terrorists-ofcom-top-lawyers/

Interestingly, on their Bitsize page, they describe the Palestinian Liberation Front as a terrorist group, which is true. The mere fact that they have a page on ‘terrorism’ indicates that they don’t take a moral position against the word, just against calling Israel (and Israeli factions/allies) terrorists - https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/guides/zy7nqhv/revision/1

Bullshit. They’ve used the word ‘terrorist’ for every other attack in the past two decades (9/11, London Bridge, Manchester Arena, 7/7, etc.). Was that not ‘choosing sides’ then?

They just can’t admit that the UK fucked up and condemn Israel because the lawyers told them not to

No, it’s announcing their cowardice. They use ‘terrorist’ for any other non-Israel/Palestine attack (9/11, London Bridge, 7/7, etc) so the entire argument is invalid.

The lawyers told them not to because everyone’s scared of being called anti-semitic, that’s all