The soul thing is very poor ground to argue on yes which is why I immediately spent the time to make a different one :)
At very best it’s an intuitive understanding of “procedural oatmeal” where the brain spots patterns in the output so quickly it becomes tired of the art and loses interest.
But I think that’s being generous and I think of lot of the time it’s a purely to stake a position based on identity and a challenge to that identity.
It’s not any of those reasons, it’s because it can only exist by being trained on human authored art and in many cases you can extract a decentish copy of the original if you can specify enough tags that piece was labelled with.
The ai model is a lossy database of art and using them to launder copyright violations should be illegal, is immorally stealing from the creator, and chills future artists by taking away the revenue they need while learning. This leads to ai model art having not enough future work to train on and the stagnation of the human experience as making beautiful things is not profitable enough, or doesn’t give the profit to those with power.
In a brief statement, the UK government said it had not been able to add its name to it because of concerns about national security and “global governance.”
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c8edn0n58gwo
No idea if thats a real reason or not.
You’re right, I’ll edit a corrrection
Not to disrespect the amazing achievements of the Finn’s in that war, but they lost, and lost half their country. (Edit: 10%, not half. Sorry Finland.)
Incredible job not to lose the whole thing ofc.
Great at raising money, even better at giving it to nvidia
At absolute best it’s breaking even before debt service.
Maybe he’s still not just paying rent on some buildings and miraculously hasn’t been kicked out yet
Ask for the code and git history
The EU is doing great. It can pay for loads of stuff with the endless fines American tech companies rack up
I’m posting the same comment in two replies here now, terrible behaviour, but yes exactly this was an attempt to force a sale and get tiktok into American ownership.
It feels very neat that America would think tiktok would ultimately choose the option where it gets more money, but that the Chinese instead choose control.
The theory is the tiktok “ban” was an attempt to force a sale on favourable terms , but tiktok has called the bluff.
Has he ruled out licking them both so no one else wants them?
The comments here show the real problem, adverts dont have to say why they’ve been selected.
All online ads should have to say which filters they matched to advertise to you. The advertising in most cases now is centralised into Google or Facebook, this is absolutely technically possible.
Right, Amazon can do it because their best workers already left or never existed. Gigantic churn rate, terrible reputation.
Very much not legal for teachers in the UK
https://www.thisislocallondon.co.uk/news/24800903.teacher-sexual-relationship-pupil-banned/
I’m glad it’s not just me
Yes as others said, the op mentioned notepad and you said notebookllm.
I thought you were talking about notepad and it’s new ai features.
You’re using the wrong tool.
Hell, notepad is the wrong tool for every use case, it exists in case you’ve broken things so thoroughly on windows that you need to edit a file to fix it. It’s the text editor of last resort, a dumb simple file editor always there when you need it.
Adding any feature (except possibly a hex editor) makes it worse at its only job.
There was definitely a problem at first (when musk bought twitter) on mastodon with people buying a server instance for the black community, and then not actually blocking all the standard bad servers.
Basically giving them a server full of targets to harass.
I guess you could say setting up an instance and maintaining a blue sky block list is sort of similar, you’re taking it on yourself to see all the horrible stuff, even seeking it out, to protect others.
The blue sky approach lets people use multiple Blocklists though and masto just has the one of the server you’re on and your personal one. Lots of room for improvement.
Oh dear no I’m repying to agree. It is all good.
It’s a lazy Sunday and while I have a dozen better things to do trying to make clear posts about ai in a place where people will agree intelligently is a nice waste of time.