Triggered? Enjoying those 50 cents of russian rubles? Go lick putin’s boot more.

red fascists = fascist


Alts:

@2030TimeTraveler@sh.itjust.works

@2030TimeTraveler@sopuli.xyz

  • 1 Post
  • 88 Comments
Joined 15 days ago
cake
Cake day: November 7th, 2024

help-circle


  • We don’t know which would be authoratative. Yes paper trails can be used to verify votes, but the problems if only one of them is legally considered “authoratative” meaning the one that holds legal weight. State supreme courts can be partisan and say only the electronic votes are authoritative. District courts and especially the supreme court could also weight in.

    So you could end up with a recount saying the electronics votes are wrong, but then the legal system could still declare the electroic votes as official.

    But if we just use paper ballot only, there is only one set of ballots so then they have to be authoritative.














  • It is a democracy.

    Not a good type, but still a democracy.

    Remember, Democracy and Autocracy isnt binary states of its either a Full Totalitarian Regime or a Full Direct Flawless Democracy.

    There’s a sliding scale in between.

    We don’t just go from Monarchies to a perfect Utopian Flawless Democratic system overnight. Change is incremental.

    I do agree with the sentiment that 2 party system isn’t really a good idea, that very much need to be changed.

    But its not like the constitution says “The United States shall be a 2-party system”, its an emergent property of First-Past-The-Post electoral systems. But unfortunately, human brains always look for the first thing they think of, I mean “Most Votes Win” sounds simple right. People never thought about the fact that “Most” doesn’t mean majority, but by the time people realize, its too late, people go too used to it.

    But its still a democracy, a very very flawed democracy. But if you argue that First-Past-The-Post isn’t a democracy, then most of the world are living in dictatorships.