A little off-topic: anyone else read this as “BCA Chefs”, initially?

Right? McConnel has kinda always been the GOP’s fall guy in the senate. The one who takes all the heat for unpopular shit, when the entire party is actually on board. Donny probably just didn’t get the memo.

or the equipment os designed horribly

I find this entirely believable. There’s a LOT of equipment out there designed for profit over user experience.

But you’re right, it’s not really worth speculating over.

I mean, yeah, they could do exactly that. “We cater to the needs of creative professionals and personal users that need a streamlined user experience” or some other execu-speak. Who are they gonna alienate, all those gamers that are already not buying macs for gaming?

“Hey, there, this is Josh, with Let’s Game it Out!”

Eat shit, Steve Pigeon.

Seems like the y’re taking issue not with the technology, but Rite-Aid’s implementation of it, particularly that they didn’t do any of the required dilligence to prove that the tech wouldn’t be harmful, or violate privacy, or would even be accurate.

First time I’ve ever seen noon and midnight represented as 12nn and 12mn, and I’m kinda down for it.

Occasionally. If I’m at my desk and I get a call, I’ll move my wired headset over from my PC to my phone.

it makes them completely inaccessible to client side JavaScript

Dude literally said to do this for browser clients, and only support bearer tokens for non browser clients.

He knows the answer. It’s a rhetorical question, meant to piss off iPhone users.

Yeah, but like, holy crap, there’s a way to make phantoms not spawn?! TIL

Did anyone really think that making UEFI systems the equivalent of a mini OS was a good idea? Or having them be accessible to the proper OS? Was there really no pushback, when UEFI was being standardized, to say “images that an OS can write to are not critical to initializing hardware functionality, don’t include that”? Was that question not asked for every single piece of functionality in the standard?

deleted by creator

Thanks for the giggle.

It’s not, that’s the joke, based on Elon’s rant about losing advertisers the other day.

Gotta love when an articpe describes something in the title, and then doesn’t actually put the details of that thing in the article. The only mention of the bible in the article is “After quoting from the bible, the Democratic lawmaker said…”

Anyone know what the actual quote was?

The Apache 404 page doesn’t really seem that interesting.

For sure, but that doesn’t mean we’re cool with marketing it to kids.

“Parents Sue Cigarette Companies Over ‘Tobacco Addiction’, Because That’s Easier Than Parenting”

When a company makes a product they don’t just KNOW is harmful, but BECAUSE it’s harmful, and they’ve ENGINEERED it to be harmful, for the sake of profit, it ceases to be solely about parenting.