Are you talking about TPM 2? Because I don’t think that makes classic ransomware more difficult. Also it doesn’t have to be strictly a motherboard feature, e.g mine comes without a fixed hardware TPM, but my processor supports fTPM, which has up- and downsides. But it works as a TPM.

Also MS: Sadly, if your tech doesn’t have these features you cannot upgrade and it will be insecure because I will not make updates for it.

Technically, this isn’t true, MS will continue to update Windows 10 and even individual users can receive these officially through the Windows 10 ESU program: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/whats-new/extended-security-updates

Not that I’m in favor of what they’re doing, I think they should rather support older hardware with Win 11 and require modern features only on modern systems. But from a security standpoint, their decision is actually good, as it builds a secure foundation. Most private users will just do whatever on that foundation (e.g. run random stuff from the Internet), but I think going forward, this is the right choice, though probably for the wrong reason of doing Intel a favor.

This is part of the point I was trying to make

I mean… The general point still stands. It’s not that western nations seriously doubt that Russia has these weapons. We know Russia has ICBMs, we know they have nukes, we know they’re willing to attack Ukraine with conventional weapons.

What Western nations doubt is that Russia would actually attack them or use nukes, because it’d trigger a united response they’d lose against, and they know that and want to avoid it.

It’s not about capabilities, but willingness.

The problem I have with this is that there’s no definition of what “owning” means. Never have individuals bought a game and then owned all rights associated with it. It was always a license that included personal use and nothing much else.

However, due to how media distribution worked, this license was generally valid forever and could be transferred to another party, and these two factors - especially the first one - make a good point: why would I enter such a license if the other side can factually nullify it at any point, while I lose that option after a certain time?

Apart from that, media piracy was never stealing in the first place. It’s about unlicensed usage and distribution of media. And rightholders can’t be surprised if people don’t license it if the construct is so stacked to their disadvantage.

You claim that nuclear is short sighted, but then you claim we should be using renewables. Where do those renweables get their energy? From nuclear.

Yeah… a nuclear fusion reaction that has about 18*10^29 kg of hydrogen available at its disposal and is conveniently placed in a vacuum, mostly unaffected by gravity other than its own, with magnetic fields enabling it.

When we speak of nuclear as a source of electric energy, it’s about nuclear fission. And it’s not like we’re not trying, nuclear fusion research is going on since over 60 years, with insane amounts of money invested into it and yet no result that is practical for large scale electric energy generation.

Its easy to make the argument that we didnt have to pay the upfront costs of the sun, but the sun itself isnt renewable. Even if you invested fully into renewables now, for humanity to last long term you would STILL have to eventually go nuclear. And what about deep space habitats? They cant use renweables pretty much at all.

If you think humanity (or actually, any form of life) can sustain once the sun no longer exists as it does now (probably becoming a red giant), you’re probably wrong. But that consideration is of no importance when talking about covering today’s energy needs

I guess it depends. They’re not that trendy here in Germany. In fact I think the last time I got some was 15 years ago when I cought lymphatic tract inflammation after getting bitten by an insect. Since this was most likely a bacterial infection that can lead to sepsis. No antibiotics since then. So from experience I’d say they’re not prescribed just because.

The other problem is that basically the same amount of antibiotics is used for livestock. And this was a way bigger percentage about 15 years ago.

I think if LetsEncrypt went away, so would ZeroSSL’s free offer.

However, I do think not having limitations on the API is good; automation is good practice and I guess this is a concession to customers /users who have no automation in place (though this is a sad state by now). LE doesn’t offer anything comparable AFAIK.

Never used them, but they state at https://zerossl.com/features/acme/ that their free acme certs include wildcards.

By itself nothing. It was more along the lines of “why doesn’t the Finnish game support the Finnish kennel”.

Noita doesn’t even need proton, it’s using OpenGL so plain wine is perfectly fine.

Maybe ZeroSSL

Were you banned or shadow banned?

I was only shadow banned once, however never banned normally.

Dang I haven’t played Noita in like a week

Thinking about it, it’s weird that it has no native Linux version

Better than me getting shadow banned from reddit for using one, I appealed back then

Ukraine was under the Russian orbit since the 1700s. It was a fifth of the economic output of the USSR. In the Russian nation-state mythology Kiev is the mother city of all Russians. They share one of the largest borders in the world of mostly plains.

There’s a lot of reasons. Russia views Ukraine as theirs. Neither Finland or Alaska hold a fraction of the ideological, historic, and strategic importance to the Russians

Right, what I was getting at was that all the other claims are bullshit, this is a war because winning it would grant Russia strategic advantages, and they thought they’d win the conflict, probably not even expecting a full war; just a three day special operation.

go and re-read the 1994 agreement. it does not promise any help at all beyond promising to “seek immediate [UN] Security Council action”.

That’s why I wrote “granted”, I know this is more of a political intentions paper, my point was that nobody can act surprised when a signatory actually follows through later.

One could ask the question why states are choosing to align with countries other than Russia. The answer is that most of Russia’s allies get screwed. Look at Armenia’s situation with the CSTO.

Sheesh gramps get with the times

Military deployments aren’t “meat grinders” for your own troops if they’re well-equipped and trained. That’s the whole point of western militaries.

War is shit. But as an ex-soldier: you know what you sign up for. I also expected it during my service, though it never happened.

It’s like saying calling firefighters to rescue someone from a burning house is only acceptable if you ran into it first. It makes no sense.

The fact that this wasn’t a three day operation is in large part sure to the US. But your portrayal of the facts makes no sense. Nobody is forcing Ukraine to ask the US for help (except Russia). The US obliges because it does align with their interest. But in the end, all international help at scale is motivated by national interest.

Testing out new battlefield technology before the next Great War.

Should a nation only fight with pre-agreed equipment that is at least of a certain age?

Unfortunately for the people of Ukraine the geopolitical motives and interests of the US don’t necessarily align with their interests.

Well, they for sure don’t align with Russia’s.

Like Chomsky says “we will fight them to the last Ukrainian”

Or was it North Korean?

How was Ukraine “destabilized” compared to other comparable ex-USSR states until 2014?

And it worked. Which is why Russia invaded in 2014

If a country being in US orbit is a reason for Russia to attack it, why didn’t they attack Finland? Or the US directly in Alaska? What’s the significance with Ukraine?

There’s none other that Russia thought it was an easy target, breaking the Budapest Memorandum (and later other agreements). The same memorandum btw granted Ukraine non-military aid from the US and France, so the argument that this was somehow a dirty play makes no sense.

Who hates ChromeOS? Never heard someone say that

Snaps both predate flatpak and do things that Flatpaks are not designed to do.

By less than a year judging by the article… and for individual applications, there was AppImage.

Snaps can do things flatpaks can’t do. Which is true but also kind of irrelevant if we’re talking about a means to distribute applications in a cross-distribution manner as opposed to a base system A/B partition solution.

Or am I misunderstanding?