Both of them are just encrypted cloud storage, not a private cloud like nextcloud

Their customer support is the worst I’ve ever experienced though. If nothing goes wrong,I guess they’re okay.

I’d recommend internxt or skiff instead as not self hosted alternatives

Nitrokey isn’t fully open source though. The secure element is proprietary. But that’s not their fault, OSS secure elements aren’t a thing yet unfortunately, but some companies wanna bring a change in that

Looks good. I also add compress=zstd to / subvolume. I don’t add discard because it’s set up in LUKS for me. I also don’t use a separate subvolume for /var/log, so where possible, compression is used. Journald auto adds +C attr to prevent COW being active on those files because it’s unnecessary. I also use a separate swapfile instead of a separate fs.

Also not a fan of Session missing FS. So I replaced it with SimpleX, but it’s quite a dead community. The app also feels like something beta, but I have high hopes for it

Molly as hardened signal alternative

It’s too bad that it’s so fragmented nowadays.

Same here. I’ve always wondered what dbus actually was and I’m glad OP asked

Cool. Very useful to just pinpoint on the goal of stopping

Works now 👍

That sounds like a great idea. It would also be great if you’d use the formatting that’s describes in the rules and linked by otter@lemmy.ca, so we can open the community easily from any instance

I’m using a Slate router as an access point. It’s really awesome. They just provide a UI on top of vanilla openwrt, but you can still go to that UI via “advanced mode”. We need more of OSS routers!

I think it’s more about portability and making it easier for windows devs to support Linux for their games

Also a noob, but I think Microsoft improved low-level access in recent DX versions

Innovation my ass. Their UI has been as a disaster as ever. Major reason why I stopped paying for their crappy service years ago

What about a hardware key? Like nitrokey or yubikey?

How would peer reviewing in a user repo be more a sense of false security compared to official repos? I don’t know any of the arch maintainers, so for me it’s also pure trust they don’t do shady stuff.

Peer reviewing would not be failproof for sure, but at least it would give more security than not reviewing the pkbuilds, and especially to those that aren’t too familiar with them

I would argue that it’s their own fault then. Laziness is not a valid excuse to put yourself so much at risk. If you start doing it consistently, it becomes a habit and won’t take much effort. Of course, the familiarity with PKBUILD syntax has a learning curve

But a peer-reviewing system would be a better approach in AUR. Weird that it’s not been implemented yet.

I don’t get all the noise around AUR being unsafe. Just verify the PKGBUILDS whenever you install or update something.

Lokinet is a modern alternative to both