If you’d ever taken any advanced math, you’d see that the answer is 1 all day. The implicit multiplication is done before the division because anyone taking advanced math would see 2(1+2) as a term that must be resolved first. The answer still lies in the ambiguity of the way the problem is written though. If the author used fractions instead of that stupid division symbol, there would be no ambiguity. It’s either 6/2 x 3 = 9 or [6/(2x3)] = 1. Comment formatting aside, if someone put 6 in the numerator, and then did or did NOT put all the rest in the denominator underneath a horizontal bar, it would be obvious.

TL;DR It’s still a formatting issue, but 9 is definitely not the clear and only answer.

“Hey, that sounds pretty nasty, how about a courtesy flush over there?”

-Tom Arnold

Sick fucks.

Been saying that for a while now too. The people bankrolling him; Saudi Arabia and Russia, have a vested interest in seeing Twitter burn after the Arab Spring organized around it, and Ukraine found so much support on the platform. The thing is, he can’t directly run it into the ground without lawsuits so he’s doing it piece by piece.

He did repeat the same. Mwuahahah.

Well, if it’s on the internet, it must be true. Everyone knows that.

RBG was too ______ to retire as well.

Whoa, whoa…I was told this was a Reddit replacement and this is way too kind, humble, accepting, and level headed.

This is downright peaceful.

There’s nothing bad about admitting you were wrong, it only proves you are wiser today than you were yesterday.

–Someone…I dunno, don’t ask me names, I suck at names.

I’m a bit of an opter outer as well.

Is Uncle Asbestos coming?

But he has a robot maid and nobody has to cook.

That’s frustrating cause I didn’t forget it. Lemmy’s web interface is janky.

Assuming I’m heavily armed, the song at the end of Max Payne 3.

Alright, so I’m studying to be a counselor, and one of the methods they taught us about using with little kids was called sand tray therapy. It’s where you put toys/dolls/objects in a small sandbox and ask the kids to tell a story with them. The idea is that they might not have the right words yet, but they can communicate ideas and emotions more easily in pretend play. Anyway, they show us a video of this little girl setting up a doll for her dad, her dad’s new girlfriend, and herself. The therapist asks her what would the scene be like if it were perfect…the little girl flicks her finger to knock the new girlfriend face down in the sand and walks off holding her dad’s hand; leaving the new girlfriend behind. And in that moment, I understood the power of sand tray therapy.

Presenting subjective truths as factual is the easiest giveaway that they aren’t anywhere close to being a real university. Pure propaganda, and they can’t even get they right.

Oh man, this feels good because I filed an FTC complaint against them :D

It’s called re-volution, not just volution.

President Lyndon B. Johnson once said, “If you can convince the lowest white man he’s better than the best colored man, he won’t notice you’re picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he’ll empty his pockets for you.”

That’s totally fine, just don’t light no grill.