I love that we have hundred people saying that English is the past and irrelevant… Needing to use English to share that though.

You can’t merge a generative model and a classification model. You can run then in series to get a bunch of false positives/hallucinations, but you can’t make it generate something from the other model.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_positives_and_false_negatives

Not that I think you will understand. I’m posting this mostly for those moronic enough to read your comments and think “that seems reasonable”

Cinnamon is nice. But then I meet KDE…

Honestly, if you’re happy with Ubuntu, don’t worry about what other people think. A lot of the (valid) complains of Ubuntu require research to understand why to be outraged.

I personally only use immutable now (bazite, aurora and steam OS) and I wouldn’t have it any other way now.

This doesn’t say it’s difficult, just says there are others which are less difficult. Even if you accept everything at default, windows installs take much longer.

I’m not sure why you even think this is an attack on windows really. You keep saying windows is for those who want easy to use, so why not include the whole process?

So you need to have a model that generates CP to begin with. Flawless reasoning there.

Look, it’s clear you have no clue what you’re talking about. Stop demonstrating it, moron.

It differs in basically being something completely different. This is a classification model, doesn’t have generative capabilities. Even if you were to get the model and it’s weights, and you tried to reverse engineer an “input” that it would classify as CP, it would most likely look like pure noise to you.

Moron

It’s not even “chose an instance”. This is what my journey has been:

1. Chose an instance
2. Write an essay about why you wanted that one 3 never her reply, repeat 1 and 2
3. Get access, then instance goes offline. Repeat 1 and 2
4. Get another instance. They then bock piracy communities. Repeat 1 and 2
5. Land in lemm.ee.
6. Wait until I can block instances to get rid of nuances (everybody knows who I’m talking about)

Now try to get your non tech friends on board.

Some seem to argue not even one of them is needed…

Here’s an example and why I’m not on a custom ROM. My job has “restaurant credit” as one of the benefits. That’s 200 euros a month in a card that can only be used through Google/Apple pay.

So either I skip the money or I need a second phone with me all the time.

Not sure if there is much chance for effective carbon capture. The article states that this works for getting rid of very low concentrations of methane (so burning is not possible). That means that even with the methane 100% turned into carbon, we are talking about very small concentrations.

There probably were a lot of discussions and negotiations, but a lot of the public only sees Netflix going back to Twitter. I’m sure Elmo fans will promote this as Netflix having to bow down

I didn’t know Apple did security updates after feature updates. I really hope my iPad pro first gen gets this, even if it’s the last update it ever gets.

About EU forcing sideload, is it known how they have to implement? Only new devices? All supported devices?

Well, the problem is that every would need to have their own server with notifications waiting to be pulled (imagine your phone goes offline) and they need to be beefy enough to answer potentially thousands of requests per second. Almost impossible for small devs.

There’s also additional battery need, as it’s many calls and payloads, and if a server is slow it can affect all the other notifications. Plus more area of attack.

Not impossible, but I don’t think it’s the direction things will go.

Imagine you have 20 apps that can send receive notifications from remote (messaging apps, offers, updates…). That would require each app to be active in the background and pulling updates. That’s a massive battery drain.

Instead, the apps send the notifications to Apple/Google, and the OS checks for all of the apps. The apps don’t need to be awake (the OS could show the notification or wake the app) and there’s only one service checking for the ml notifications.

It’s a massive oversimplifying and probably I made some mistakes, but that’s my understanding. Hopefully somebody can correct me.

One of the state laws that Tesla complains about is Cal. Veh. Code § 24011.5, which says that companies “shall not name any partial driving automation feature, or describe any partial driving automation feature in marketing materials, using language that implies or would otherwise lead a reasonable person to believe, that the feature allows the vehicle to function as an autonomous vehicle.”

So Tesla accepts they mislead the customers but that’s their constitutional right?

I would love for somebody to honestly defend/show a different interpretation. It sounds so bad I can’t on my own understand how people still defend this.

What personally identification information is there? Sure, they can know everything is from the same user/household, but they can’t know it’s you by name, email, phone, address… That’s what I mean by anonymous instead of private

“I’m in”

• your TV after hacking the neighbors tv.

Joke aside, would that make it basically anonymous? Unless it’s actually sending screenshots, it will only tell “somebody around this IP is watching TV/Something from HDMI”

You can use the browser or an app, just like YouTube