So it wouldn’t be genocide if Palestine was bigger?

But in that case any sufficiently destructive attack on a city in a war (e.g. Dresden) would be considered genocide, no?

If intent to destroy a group is required, how can you call anything a genocide? You’d have to prove that that is their intent, which will be pretty much impossible in the majority of cases.

15 thousand million million?

= 15 quadrillion USD?

Fine, then get rid of both

Not sure I’d list Al Jazeera here, the other two would do just fine

Altarboys

It really isn’t, look at the other articles on that site

What are you expecting from “World Socialist Website”? Fact-based reporting? I don’t think so.

I’m not sure what you’re trying to say here

Maybe, maybe not, that really makes no difference here

Yes, because you’re so blinded by your indoctrination that you can’t accept the flaws of “your” side.

Idk about equally, but often enough, both sides are indeed wrong.

Don’t hold your breath lol. Btw did you just forget about the biggest colonizer of them all because they’re not in the EU anymore?

Why would that be the EU’s responsibility? Most of its members never were colonizers.

Arguments for what? There are plenty of good arguments in the comment I’m responding to.

You are absolutely correct. And just to prove your point, some American is definitely going to accuse you of being right-wing (since most of lemmy is left) for pointing that out.

If anything that’s an argument against immigration, considering what happened to the people that lived there before

Fair enough :)

Fair enough