• 0 Posts
  • 132 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: July 10th, 2023

help-circle


  • Like are shell commands different between distros, or do I have to install something to have certain commands?

    Yes and no, kinda. So the most popular shell by far is Bash, which includes its own built in functions, and can also be extended with custom functions which certain distros may include in your bash config file by default. But generally, Bash and the GNU coreutils are standard, although some more “hip” distros will include other shell prompts such as zsh or fish by default, but even those tend to come with bash for script compatibility or easy switching for user preference. Some distros may include programs by default, but most of the time those are easily available in other distros through the package manager.

    How do I even know what commands I do have?

    compgen -c (or compgen -c | more for a scrollable list (press q to exit)) should do the trick, but that is a built-in bash command that may not be available on other shells, but generally you can find all the programs able to be called from shell inside the

    /bin

    /sbin

    /usr/bin

    and

    /usr/sbin

    directories. All these directories are added to a variable called $PATH, and when you type a command into your shell, these are the places that get searched for a matching program to run. You can use echo $PATH to see all the directories on your machine which are searched, or even add your own directory containing custom scripts or utilities so you can use them anywhere like an installed program.
















  • expanding “fair use”

    I’m not talking about fair use, I’m talking about public domain; complete freedom to modify or redistribute.

    Said pain should be rewarded

    Yes, by temporary monopoly

    Amazon shouldn’t be able to find something just outside of the copyright window to copy and redistribute.

    Why not? Project Gutenberg provides an incredible service (and LibriVox) which is based entirely on the concept of old works naturally falling into public domain. Imagine how absurd it would be if you still had to pay the publisher of Charles Dickens to read A Christmas Carol.

    some content farm could just copy a video, reupload it, then rake in all the profits

    Do you see content farms making bank with public domain content now? This is a ridiculous scenario, you obviously have not thought out this issue and instead are just justifying your feelings on the matter. Old things belong to everybody, culture is meant to be shared.

    because copyright for small creators is rarely enforced

    That’s a completely separate matter bud, go ahead and advocate for enforcing the law for small creators, I’m talking about what the limit for those protections should be.


  • I don’t see this working out well in today’s world because old stuff is brought up and popularized seemingly often

    That’s a feature, not a bug. Humans have always built upon that which came before, that’s why Robin Hood is a beloved story because each generation could do what they want with it, or King Arthur, or Shakespeare.

    Nobody owns ideas, if you come up with something neat, sure have 20 years to try and make it successful, otherwise it’s free real estate. Anything else is a perversion of human nature.