George W. Bush comes to mind.

And Idiocracy deems that most of us would watch it apparently…

He went to Nostr the cryptobro libertarian block chain social media network.

Dorsey has nothing to do with the Bluesky anymore. https://www.theverge.com/2024/5/5/24149543/jack-dorsey-gone-bluesky-board

The VC money will require recoup on investment at some point. It might feel good now, but enshittification comes for them all. https://pluralistic.net/2024/11/02/ulysses-pact/

This was February of 2022. He isn’t even the President of Brazil anymore.

So they would vote for Vance in that case, which is technically successional.

Exactly, this is a strange concept to get hung up on. In China and North and South Korea, a woman in a stereotypical heterosexual marriage keeps her name and the children get the father’s name. There are numerous traditions globally.

Which again, is inevitable. Good luck getting the Supreme Court to rule against the Republicans if this happened. The ticket was on the ballot, not the individual candidate for President.

This conversation is so white and western culture centric. Many cultures have different norms. Centering on this as the normal/accepted route is strange given how international our societies have become.

Yes. The ticket got elected, not just orange turdsicle. Succession applies here.

Founded upon genocides by slaveholders.

This is how colonialism works.

“The bastion of democracy in the middle east.” 🙃

Yeah, the Guinness pint is now 14.9 fucking ounces in the US. Relatives of mine in Ireland confirmed that if they did that shit there, they’d have another rebellion.

One of my public utilities just updated their ToS to waive a right to class action for users. Utter shit.

People like having choice, it was never about saving space in phones. I like my wired bose headphones that I’ve had for 15 years and will likely last at least 15 more. Those wireless ones are the definition of planned obsolescence.

In these cases, how about a wild third alternative: nonviolence.

As someone who has peacefully protested along with hundreds of others, where that was used on us, I wonder how you think this is not escalation. “to the point it causes harm” is escalation. FWIW, these weapons were first tested on Palestinians, to force them to leave their homes so Israeli settlers could assume their land. None of this is without escalation, it is precisely the point.

De Beers: always on the right side of history. 🫠