My issue is that on the (?second) day of the war, a group of Western reporters were presented with “evidence” of the planning that had gone into the attack, and I found the “evidence” to be laughably bad - the evidence itself, the supposed circumstances it was found under, the condition of the evidence - all were bad. And if you present such incredibly poor “evidence” at one point, I’m going to automatically be much more suspicious of any other “evidence” you present later.
Have you ever known trump to actually pay for anything? Of course he’s going to take the free flight. Years ago there was some reporter who sent checks for like $3.00 to a whole bunch of really rich people. Trump was one of like three people who actually cashed the check.