They discussed it publicly. Dumbass Jr has been tweeting about it for months.

AIPAC didn’t donate to the presidental election. Adelson did give Trump $100m for the west bank though.

Individuals are reponsible for their actions. They didn’t need to support the dems just have a spine and vote against Trump.

Huh, why? Because of shit management?

Not yet it isn’t and yes, he did. He announced it the other day. The ethnic clensing of 2M people

Probably more to do with the mass delusion and post truth world we live in.

And yes, enabling the greater evil is a failing of the people who voted against their interests because less evil wasn’t good enough.

We know they’re war-criminals. There’s still a difference between that and leveling the place for a hotel. Trump gleefully accepted $100m from Adelson for the west bank.

Stop assuming we’re pro-dems and not just anti-trump.

Nah they just want to Elysium us before their wealth gets redistributed

https://www.vcinfodocs.com/what-is-the-network-state

Hence weighted by reputation.

*for the better option.

Idk. Ban from communities after negative karma threshold with an automatic vote weighted by users subreddit karma to appeal? Just the first thing that popped to mind though sure there’s better ways. Matrix was working towards something iirc last i checked.

As it stands you can get blocked for life from a significant portion of lemmy for saying Trump is worse than Kamala would’ve been.

What a daft thing to say. Shove your shill gambit up your arse ya troglodyte and grow a spine.

I am a leftist, not a liberal. IDK what the liberals are doing or why you’re telling me. I’m pretty sure they stole the election - but the narratives equating Trump/Kamala on Palstine certainly contributed to lower-turnout and apathy.

Brother I have done plenty.

And they aren’t mutually exclusive. You should be doing the other things AND voting for whatever party is most aligned with your views that has a chance of winning.

I’m Scottish not American.

And bad faith how, this guy has based his identity around Chomsky who agrees with what I’m saying. He is arguing in bad faith ‘Are you sure you’re an anarchist?’ lol

No that is your logic. You’d be pro-supporting-the-lesser-genocide. There’s no lesser option that is available beyond your choice. There is for someone who abstained, so their position actively supported exacerbating the genocide.

I wouldn’t use any of those other features. I just browse by top all 1/6/12 hr (which piefed lacks) and the theme isn’t great either.

How does it offer either of those things? I see an ‘attitude %’ on hover, and it says it has ‘strong moderation tools’. But I mean 100% community run. Subscribers have to vote on bans or something. And proof of personhood verification tests.

Yeah there was still problems with the admins. But 95% of the problems people encountered day-to-day and what killed discussion and the vibe was virgin subreddit mods.

Doesn’t really work once spaces are established. Most of reddits problems aren’t the admins, it’s the volunteer subreddit mods which function just the same as lemmy.

Yes we’re missing two things

• Anonymous ID / Reputation system to tell it’s a human
• Community-run moderation. So some chronically online sadsack can’t ban you from a significant portion of lemmy for life because you disagreed with them.