No worries. Updated for clarity.

Where’s the one with the green witch who buys one, the potion seller says “who are you going to give it to” and she shrieks MYSELF and downs it

Correct. 6.0 is when it was introduced.
I keep trying it on 5 and then remembering and being sad.

Note: Only on Plasma 6.0 (edit: and up)

0.9.final.revised.25BAK.lastbest.final

Ah yes
The failing newspaper strategy

…into the ground

Why does the video stop when you turn your phone screen off?
If the only answer is “so that people will pay money for it”, you are garbage.

Yeah the extended range sweet potato ocarina is pretty specific, if you go buy an ocarina uninfluenced by Zelda it’s way more likely that you’d get a medallion ocarina.
Hey, is Songbird Ocarina still around? I miss mine.

Debian has its own kernel, and security team, in fact as Ubuntu is downstream of Debian they get the full benefit of Debian’s security patches (yes Canonical maintains their own kernel, but the vast majority of other packages are pulled from Debian’s repositories), fwupd isn’t unique to Ubuntu, KDE has been combining update managers into Discover for ages, not everybody likes Gnome.
You’re saying “replicate” like these are all things Ubuntu did first and everyone else is copying them. That’s ignorant at best and disingenuous at worst.

I’ve been using it for many years and I have no idea who Chris Titus is.
There’s no reason to use Ubuntu over Debian, especially since Bookworm included non-free firmware in installation media by default.

Ubuntu is Debian with lipstick so that all still applies

Then .device and .boot and .home and .gov and .co.uk

Then .timer. Then .mount. Then .automount. Then .socket.

We all thought the community was satire or at least self deprecative humor.

dd if=/dev/urandom | aplay

Debian starting with Bookworm has all the advantages of Ubuntu with none of the drawbacks of being a Canonical product.

I get it.
But as far as I can tell, there are just two xorgs now, one of them is just spelled “Wayland”.

Oh what. That’s weird.

All of the technically-minded posts I’ve read about systemd have been positive. The only detractors seem to be the ones with less technical knowledge, complaining about “the Unix philosophy” and parroting half-understood ideas, or worse, claiming that it’s bad because they have to learn it.

I know xorg has problems, but it was good to get some insight into why Wayland is falling short. Every argument I’ve seen in favor of Wayland has been “xorg bad”.