@BRINGit34 Oh, not to be confused with another “Paisa”, personal finance manager, also made in India https://github.com/ananthakumaran/paisa
@BRINGit34 Oh, not to be confused with another “Paisa”, personal finance manager, also made in India https://github.com/ananthakumaran/paisa
@SNFi Woodpecker passed 1.0 recently and it’s much better. Try it again.
Oh damn, I always thought Apache2.0 will protect also the derivative works, but apparently I was wrong:
> You may add Your own copyright statement to Your modifications and may provide additional or different license terms and conditions for use, reproduction, or distribution of Your modifications, …
> We have gotten used to this being ubiquitous and “free as in beer” but it’s not really.
Any big company which cannot bear the costs of publishing code to github can just calculate how much it would have costed them, then send the code to me and I’ll upload it to github for them and only ask for half of the price. Seriously, I’ll halve your “cost”. Because it is actually free and they are just bullshitting.
emphasis on *their*
Other contributors are sending their code under this agreement https://github.com/vector-im/element-web/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md#sign-off
that would be stealing the code from all of the other contributors. I don’t see any signoff to allow them to double-license these contributions.
wait what?
https://github.com/beeper/self-host
> Beeper Clients
> Native iOS and Android clients (closed source forks of Element iOS and Android)
Mac OS, Windows and Linux clients (closed source forks of Element Web/Desktop)
How can an Apache-2.0 licensed project be forked as closed source?
@podified
Now how many of them are not actually open source?