Well, I didn’t say it should be ranked towards the bottom lol, if we want to make this graph accurate it would be below arch but above “Windows the normal way”

7 > 10 > 8 > 11

On this graph 10 should be where 8 is and 8 should be where 10 is, 11 is exactly where it should be

Well, if you want accuracy, then no the meme isn’t really that accurate.

On an updated Win11 system the Shift+ F10 command prompt “OOBE\BYPASSNRO” trick still works to setup a new system without Internet (and by extension, without a MS account) so that’s like most of the battle right there

The rest is taken care of with your choice of debloat scripts that are out there

Yea, I’d say Win10/11 is on the same good/shit cycle as always

Though whether Win12 breaks it and continues the shitty trend is highly likely at this point

Critique was due in any other election year without an actual literal fascist on the Republican ticket.

bLuEMaGA screechers=Projections from Trump supporters

Hate to break it to you, but the US elections ARE binary for as long as FPTP is the voting system nationwide. You want real change? advocate for things like RCV. I wouldn’t even vote for the DNC IF RCV was nationwide and third-parties actually stood a chance, I’m just being realistic.

As things stand now, you’re just demanding a fantasy. A pursuit that will now have blood on its hands because now instead of a “not really a fascist, just not as left as id like” president we have a full throat legit fascist.

party ran a piece of shit right-wing blue fascist

LMAO Just more projection from a MAGA Trump supporter

Third-party candidates?

Oh, you mean the ones who have never won a presidential election in the entire modern history of the US and has become nothing but pawns for the 2 established parties to harm the other e.g. Jill Stein, Russian asset?

Those third-party candidates?

“A non-vote or vote for a third-party is a vote for Trump”

So congrats MAGAt, your guy won!

knew she can’t be trusted with our support

Ah so you ARE a Trump supporter. Got it.

socialism will somehow magically emerge from the ashes. But that’s not how these things work.

I mean, it kinda does, the problem is that’s probably the most difficult, painful, blood-filled path to it

Well if people had done that instead of whining about “bLueMaGa” we wouldn’t be dealing with an upcoming Drump presidency.

In all likelihood, with yet another loss, MAGA would have fallen apart and Trump would be a fading memory rn.

But no, now there’s a chance voting either won’t exist or won’t matter in 4 years and we’ll have to hear about el orango damn near everyday. Good job.

Does anyone else find these OS wars silly? To me an OS is a tool and you should be using whatever tool is best suited for the job. For me I’m regularly switching between all 3 major OS’s.

I’ve got windows systems, Linux systems and MacOS all under regular use at home

The future is now old man!

690 years in case anyone was wondering lol

“BlUe MaGa”

I have…questions…

Not all AIs do, the more “traditional” ones that you’re probably thinking of don’t. The ones that are generating text, images and video, however, are based on Generative Adversarial Networks a type of Deep learning Neural Network and those do learn albeit in a rudimentary fashion compared to humans, but learning none the less.

I fail to see what he or your comment has to do with Generative AI models, which is what we are talking about.

I don’t think you fully understand how Generative AIs work. The input data is used in a similar, but far more rudimentary way, to learn as humans do. The model itself contains no recognizable original data, just a bunch of numbers, math and weights in an attempt to simulate the neurons and synaptic pathways that our brains form when we learn things.

Yes, a carefully crafted prompt can get it to spit out a near identical copy of something it was trained on (assuming it had been trained on enough data of the target artist to begin with), but so can humans. In those cases humans have gotten in trouble when attempting to profit off it and therefore in that case justice must be served regardless of if it was AI or human that reproduced it.

But to use something that was publicly available on the Internet for input is fair game just as any human might look at a sampling of images to nail down a certain style. Humans are just far more efficient at it with far far less needed data

Um no, we’re defending actual open AI models, I couldn’t give 2 shits about OpenAI. They have the funding to license things, but that open source model? Trying to compete against big corporations like Microsoft and Google? They don’t.

You’re actually advocating for the big corporations, what’s going to happen if things go the way you want is the truly open models will die off and big corporations will completely control AI from then on. Is that what you really want?