Starbucks isn’t great espresso, but there’s a reason espresso drinks cost what they do. There’s a lot more labor, a genuinely obscenely expensive machine, or both involved in making it in a shop like that.
I’m perfectly fine with a cheap machine at home, but it just doesn’t work in a coffee shop.
So, on my (Android) ereader, I use einkbro which is a browser that will save pages to epub, then can be used and organized with most reader software. You can also combine multiple web pages as chapters to the same book pretty trivially.
I don’t have a suggestion that perfectly fits your question as asked, but figured I’d suggest it anyways because it serves a relatively similar goal for me.
I’m saying they are probably being charged some portion of website sales specifically by the vendor of the web service provider. Which realistically makes sense, because regular online retail already almost always takes a percentage and there are significantly stronger regulatory requirements around anything medical.
A seasoned internet user has a password manager.
Not using one is your negligence, no one else’s.
It probably is costing them more because they’re paying some obscene license to a third party for the online software.
It’s definitely possible they’re sincere.
It’s not at all possible that I’m going to care about or respect anything they have to say about privacy or security.
They’re all bad takes.
Use parental controls.
It’s not that hard to give them the access you need them to have while completely removing anything you don’t want them to have.
By far the most offensive part of this complete and utter shit post.
I use one too.
It’s a lot more convenient as a lazy slob in bed or on the arm of the couch.
It does feel like a pretty long shot, but you’ve done all the common sense stuff and are into the weeds, so why not throw wild guesses around?
What if the battery is doing something hinky enough to cause very minor interference and the internal cable is close enough to be affected by it? I’m not super familiar with the low level details of battery tech but I think it could theoretically be possible (though obviously would be stupid rare).
Excluding some of the smaller point and shoots, which are still more volume than most phones, DSLRs and Mirrorless cameras are way bigger than phones for a reason. It’s because that’s what it takes to take actual high quality pictures without cheating heavily with processing.
I really doubt that. Computational photography is only as good as it is because of how heavily it processes all sorts of data that can’t make it into the jpeg that gets spit out.
I would love to see what an Apple camera with the hardware they leverage on iPhone, but a full frame sensor and real lens could do, because what they manage to pull out of the trash ass input is impressive. But it’s already processed to absolute hell. There’s nothing left for further passes to pull out.
If it’s malicious, it’s not penetration testing. It’s just malicious.
As far as I’m concerned skippable ads are the same thing as any other ad. I use auto play for a reason and it’s because I don’t want to fuck with the remote every episode.
It’s not intended as a drop in replacement.
Backwards compatibility forever sounds great, but the technical debt eventually becomes a giant fucking limitation on improvement. They chose not to stay backwards compatible for a reason.
They already fucking do.
They just pretend pre-roll trailers aren’t ads.
The next day? OK, they’re responsible.
A week later, they have no responsibility left. Security holes happen, even in “highly secure” systems, because of how complex they are and how difficult it is to harden every possible edge case. But people not knowing the hole exists when you find and patch it isn’t really possible, which is why they give advisories that “this is serious, you need to install it” in the first place. Every day after the patch is shipped increases your risk that bad actors have used the new knowledge to find a way to exploit the vulnerability, not through any failure of the vendor, but by the nature of what security is.
A hole existing isn’t negligent. Leaving a known vulnerability, with a shipped fix, unpatched for a week on platforms that hold sensitive consumer information is. And it’s a decent ways up the severity scale of negligence, too.
Definitely a legit way to make great coffee. I don’t usually have the 10 minutes it takes not to scorch it in the morning, but I do bring it camping and on vacation.