X11 being reliable because Xorg devs aren’t stupid

Not gonna disagree with the rest of what you said, but the Xorg devs and Wayland devs are mostly the same people

Because you can’t (easily) program gui apps to automate tasks, but combining a few terminal programs to get more complex behaviour is really easy

You don’t look like you feel bad to me

The cup looked rather big to me, but I didn’t know how big 44oz was. Guys, it’s 1.3 liters! Why tf are they carrying a 1.3 liter cup? Do they really drink that much in one day?

That’s very much not true. Workdays would typically last around 6 hours, not including multiple breaks during the day. Also, your employer would usually provide the food for lunch, and it was acceptable to have a nap in the afternoon.

In winter, even shorter days were common to account for the reduction in daylight. If you were ill, you’d simply not show up and not get paid. In fact it was normal for people to only work for what they needed in the immediate future and stop showing up as soon as they had enough for the week

deleted by creator

Desktops are superior even if only for the better cooling options, allowing your chips to sustain higher clockspeeds for longer without the machine sounding like a jet taking off

So from within vim :!pkill vim?

Vpns rely on encryption, which this bill will undermine.

Yes please, I would love not being able to scan comments to see if they are relevant to what I’m trying to do

I wouldn’t trust it to identify actual woke brands, if such a thing exists.

Yeah cause the ceo is definitely the only higher up earning a disproportionate wage

You could use jq, which will work no matter how the json is formatted.

Without trying it out, something like the following might work:

jq '.path.to.key.to.change |= 11' file.json > file.json.tmp && mv file.json.tmp file.json

Poland knew what was up in eurovision

Stamford bridge is also a bridge though. And the location of a very important battle in English history. If you’re not a football fan, you might be familiar with the battle but not the stadium (as was my case).

I think this example is more like if she thought scalloped potatoes involved scallops, but there were actually 2 dishes called scalloped potatoes, one of which does involve scallops

Also taking a side of Atlantic slave trade

Listen very carefully, I shall say this only once

From the little that I’ve used it, I believe Bootstrap for example provides both the lower-level classes like like p-4 uppercase and ui building blocks like btn btn-primary. So I guess by building daisyUI on top of Tailwind it will provide what frontend devs expect?

Ahh won’t have the reflexes for that… Maybe civ?

I think the main reason OOP has a well-known term and pattern for dependency injection is to differentiate these two (out of multiple) options:

• the constructor of my object creates other objects it depends on itself
• I construct the dependencies of my object elsewhere and pass them in to the constructor and use an interface to make it easy to swap behaviour

However, this becomes less of a pattern in functional programming as you wouldn’t make such objects to begin with. In FP, you pass all parameters where a function is invoked, and DI just becomes using generic parameters. You wouldn’t instantiate a dependency on each function call after all.

As this is such a minor change, it’s not really talked about much and it’s not really a pattern,