He gets it. No wonder why I pay for every game I play, but I refuse to sign up to streaming services again.

If I can get better quality in almost every aspect for free, your service is really crappy.

There are dozens of us. Dozens!

that’s already in the cheatsheet

Nice, mypath.open() is a more semantic alternative to open(my path)

I’ve seen plenty of grad student code, abundance of OOP concepts was never an issue. Complete lack of any structure on the other hand…

Tbh if the average grad school student overused object oriented stuff they would produce vastly better code than the status quo.

man touch

Damn right. They sell it, like good capitalists.

I wish there was. I listen to this particular podcast that has the same sponsor for years and they do make it much more entertaining than the average podcast, but I still find myself manually skipping it every time I sense it coming. And because they make it more part of the conversation, the ad moment lasts for minutes each episode, so I’m sure every regular listener had enough of that.

this kind of shit is what gives AI a bad rep

no one needs this

almost no one wants it

and they’ll kill it in a couple of years like they did it with Cortana

On desktop too, both alexandrite and original UIs. I think it’s written/pasted like that

Name, sex and ancestry were sold on the dark web, that’s a breach of private data.

It would be a breach if the data was private, but the feature itself exposes this data. That would be like presenting a concert to hundreds of people then complaining your facial attributes were leaked in social media.

pulls out heh

you stand corrected

IME you just need to spread the cheeks a little bit to avoid the loud ones

butt cheeks on a stick would be nice

The real mistake is only doing it once. It won’t itch or bother you after the first couple of times.

deleted by creator

afaik there was no breach of private data, only the kind of data shared to find relatives, which is opt-in and obviously not private to anyone who has seen how this service works. In other words, the only data “leaked” was the kind of data that was already shared with other 23andMe users.

as a software developer, that example screams bad design