Please fire him. Preferably into the sun, but I’ll accept simply out of any position in government.

It’s the same inner voice speaking thoughts instead of words on a page.

Read this sentence one word at a time. As you read it, do you hear the words spoken inside your head?

If you don’t have prime you might not buy things from Amazon which would probably be a net loss compared to the potential ad revenue increase.

I disagree. You should have validation at each layer, as it’s easier to handle bad inputs and errors the earlier they are caught.

It’s especially important in this case with email because often one or more of the following comes into play when you’re dealing with an email input:

• You’re doing more than sending an email (for ex, creating a record for a new user).
• The UI isn’t waiting for you to send that email (for ex, it’s handled through a queue or some other background process).
• The API call to send an email has a cost (both time and money).
• You have multiple email recipients (better hope that external API error tells you which one failed).

I’m not suggesting that validation of an email should attempt to be exhaustive, but a well thought-out implementation validates all user inputs. Even the underlying API in this example is validating the email you give it before trying to send an email through its own underlying API.

Passing obvious garbage inputs down is just bad practice.

Yes, but no. Pretty much every application that accepts an email address on a form is going to turn around and make an API call to send that email. Guess what that API is going to do when you send it a string for a recipient address without an @ sign? It’s going to refuse it with an error.

Therefore the correct amount of validation is that which satisfies whatever format the underlying API requires.

For example, AWS SES requires addresses in the form UserName@[SubDomain.]Domain.TopLevelDomain along with other caveats. If the application is using SES to send emails, I’m not going to allow an input that doesn’t meet those requirements.

free of journalistic bias and only cite news that factually happened with no agenda

Does such news even exist anymore?

The entire article seems designed to confuse if not intentionally mislead the reader.

“Unconditional” certainly would have fit in the title.

Or, if not, it could have been added to the text below the title that instead juxtaposes Republican opposition as if to suggest Bernie has the same interests as Republicans.

Or, it could have at least been in the first paragraph where they state Bernie’s opposition again.

But no, you have to read through nearly half the article to find that important qualifier in paragraph 5.

It’s hard to imagine this is anything other than an attempt to misrepresent his position.

Why?

You should get 33% more pay as the full work force productivity would be 4/3 of the original in your example.

This difference might be clearer with an example where only half of the work force is required to match the original productivity. In this case, if the full work force continues to work, productivity is presumably doubled. That’s not a 50% increase. It’s 200% of the original or a 100% increase. So the trade-off should be between 50% fewer working hours and 100% more pay.

Of course, instead you’ll work the same hours for the same pay and some shareholders pocket that 100% difference.

I’m pretty sure this describes some areas in the US.

Although, if they do stop some mass shootings we’d likely never hear about it. So it’s not really that straightforward to understand what, if any, impact it has had.

The use of the word “allow” here betrays his real belief, that he thinks he is in a position of power to rule over his constituents and decide for them what they are allowed or not allowed to do.

Advertising is intended to manipulate preferences and choices. Why would I willingly subject myself to such manipulation?

Honestly I don’t understand what’s wrong with the subscription model. You get YouTube ad free and YouTube music.

Such a diverse representation of the People’s House.

I imagine it would depend on the size of the plate and the degree to which correcting codes are used for redundancy.

I caught that too, but I can’t recall if it was before or after he talked about his absent wife on her knees (you know, because she was praying for her husband to receive a mandate from God so he could ascend to the speakership).

Did you mean a handful of Republicans in blue states could support Jeffries?

Unfortunately, this ineptitude will never affect a large portion of their support. House Democrats and Biden are already positioned for blame by far-right media. Ignorant arguments like Democrats helped remove McCarthy or Biden can’t get anything done abound.

Simultaneously, some on the far-right are actually happy that the house is dysfunctional because they see it as a way to stop spending increases or block other legislation. It’s a very similar position that got Trump elected, where the goal for many was simply disruption, because they’ve been convinced that the government is constantly working against their interests.